Tag Archives: Sunday NIght Movie

Sunday Night Movie: Amazon Women On The Moon

If you are a youngster there’s a curious aspect to cable TV you may have never been exposed to; Movies Until Dawn. Back in the pre-history ages, 1980’s, local television stations ran movies all night long, generally starting about midnight and running until the morning shows the next day. These early morning hours were hard to sell to advertisers and so cheap programing was needed. after de-regulation got rid of the requirement that only so many minutes our of each hour could be advertisements, these movies until dawn were replaced by the dreaded infomercials. (No programming ALL advertisement, what an advance.)

In 1987, just before they were to vanish from the screen, Movie Until Dawn were immortalized in the movie, Amazon Women On The Moon. The premise of the film is simple. It is a sketch comedy movie, and the frame that ties the sketches together as if channel surfing. There is a blast of distorted video and audio between the sketches as you are surfed from one channel to another.

The sketches in this film ranges from the freaking hilarious, the titled sketch ‘Amazon Women On The Moon,” is a lovable lampoon of those late 50’s early 60’s low-budget Sc-Fi pictures, to the truly bizarre, “Did you know every seven minutes that is a black person born without soul?” (I swear that’s Herman Cain in that sketch. And if you think I’m serious you need to get your sarcasm detector fixed.) I had not watched the film for a few years and I was concerned that the humor might have become dated, or simply lost its punch from too many viewing, but such fears were misplaced. Video Pirates, though dated in the technology it references, was still funny, and the cast of stars doing small insane bits were just as pleasing.

This is a movie worth seeing, but like all comedies I think it plays better with groups than with a single viewer. Though it did lift my spirits and gave me the exact mood I was looking for Sunday night.

Share

Sunday Night Movie: Cloverfield

I have always been a fan of the giant Monster movies. I can remember being bitterly disappointed when Godzilla vs The Smog Monster came out and I did not see the film in the theater. Given that background it is a little strange that I missed Cloverfield during its theatrical run. The truth of the matter is that life gets pretty busy these days and the film slipped past me. (It’s amazing just hwo fast a film disappears from the theaters now. I can remember E.T. and Raiders Of The Lost Ark both playing for more than a year at theaters in Sand Diego.) So Cloverfield is a film I have only seen on home video. However I think home video is the right medium for this movie.

Cloverfield is a ‘found footage’ film. The best know example of this style of film making is The Blair Witch Project, a film that is supposedly cut from the film shot by documentary filmmakers who had vanished in the woods and years later the footage is found. The most recent example of this is Apollo 18 which is supposedly made from stolen classified footage. (However it clearly impossible by the events of the film that this footage ever reached Earth and there the whole conceit is thrown into abject stupidity. Apollo 18 is a film to be avoided even on home video.) I have rarely fully enjoyed a found footage film because too often the ending does not work. It is very difficult to craft a satisfying one. Cloverfield is the exception to the rule.

I watched this back in 2009 on blu-ray via Netflix and  throughly enjoyed the experience. The hand-held shaky camera worked very well on the small screen and may have been too much for me personally on the big screen.

The setting is simple. New York, May 2008, a Godzilla-class monster shows up and starts tearing death and destruction through the metropolis. Instead of an objective viewpoint, we see the entire night’s events from one hand-held camera that start the film documenting a going away party. Cloverfield isn’t really about the monster, but rather it is about love and loss and what are you willing to do for love.

The film did stir some controversy when it was released because the imagery of the destruction as such a vast scale to New York evoked for many the memories of September 11, 2001. That is understandable, but I would never call for film makers to censor themselves because of that. We remain free in our actions, our thoughts, and our arts — anything else is real capitulation.

The film is short, just 85 minutes, and moves very quickly. (Of those 85 minutes, 11 are credits as this is a very impressive piece of special-effects works, meaning 13% of the movie is credits, perhaps the high ratio of a major feature film.) Cloverfield is also a film where no one is ‘safe’ by benefits of being a major character. While not everyone dies, the loss rate if very high.

I now own a copy on blu-ray and would easily recommend this movie.

Share

Sunday Night Movie: The Breakfast Club

I was not a teenager when this film came out in 1985, I was 24 but still this movie had a strong and visceral impact on me. However for whatever reasons this is a film I have no memory of ever watching on Videotape, Laserdisc or DVD. I recently ordered the blu-ray via Netflix and Sunday night I st down to see if the film still had that old impact or had I changed too much.

Nope, this film is still a well written, directed, and acted movie that goes far deeper than many movies do in exploring human nature and human character. It’s kind of My Dinner With Andre but with a much greater relevance for teenagers.

At the start of the film you have five stereotypes for teenagers, the princess, the jock, the brain, the criminal, and the oddball. By the end of the movie John Hughes has deconstructed these characters into characters pulling off the impressive writing feating of not only making them into human beings, but sympathetic human beings.

The blu-ray had tons of good bonus material and I shall have to consider adding it to my library.

See this movie if you have not.

 

Share

Sunday Night Movie:X2: X-Men United

So Sunday turned out to be a really Marvel Day for your humble host. (Don;t snicker, I am too humble.  I’m WAY more humble than you are.) Anyway I started my day getting up and 8:00 am and no I am not a church-goin kind of fellow, unless you count movies as church, which they might in my case. Anyway I, and my sweetie-wife, rose early so we could catch a 9:15 showing of Captain America: The First Avenger, the last piece needed before next year’s The Avengers. (my quick opinion on Captain America? It rocked. This is a very hard character to write and I imagine a harder one to play but the writers nailed it, and Chris Evans did a fine job. Frankly I consider this film an apology from director Joe Johnston for The Wolfman.) Continue reading

Share

Sunday Night Movie: Think Fast, Mr. Moto

Technically this is a Saturday Afternoon movie as the film I tried to watch Sunday Night could not hold my interest and I crawled off the bed rather early. (A weekend filled with Universal Studios, Harry Potter 7.2, fantastically lucky Scrabble games makes for a very short Sunday Evening.)

When I was younger I watched a lot of the old Charlie Chan films. Sometime ago I learned about another Asian detective from Hollywood’s less than enlightened period, Mr. Moto. Think Fast, Mr. Moto is the first in a series of movies starring Peter Lorre as a Japanese Businessman and dilettante detective. Made in 1937, before Lorre absolutely stunning job in The Maltese Falcon, Lorre, a Hungarian raised in Austria is of course cast as a Japanese detective because at this time Hollywood would never stoop to have an actual Japanese actor in a lead.

If possible this film is more insulting in its portrayal of Japanese peoples than the Chan films were of Chinese peoples. It seems that the script writers had a default rule, when in doubt has Moto say, ‘Ah so‘ for absolutely any and no reason at all. Lorre’s small stature made stature, fake buck teeth, and round glasses all added to the stereotypical image Americans had of the Japanese in these pre-war years. (While far from an expert in any manner shape or form on Japanese culture I saw nothing that indicated any research or study of the island nation by the writers. as shame.)

This mystery worked out in a standard B-mobvie plot kind of way. Moto is brilliant and two steps ahead of the crooks at nearly every turn. Perhaps one of the more interesting aspects to this story is that Moto plays at being a villain to gain information and trust, a subtly of performance that Lorre does admirably. (That would be no surprise to anyone who had seen in the Fritz Lang’s M.)

However, as much as I like Lorre, this series offers too little to entice me to watch the other seven film.

 

Share

Sunday NIght Movie:Ringu

Sorry about the Sunday Night Movie feature, upon its return, being a day late. Last night I had a nasty migraine start up — reminds me I need ot log that — and while the treximet took care of the headache nicely, it was severe enough to pack me off to bed rather early. So, a day late, but not a dollar short because this is free, here is this week’s film.

Ringu is the Japanese Horror film that was adapted into the American film The Ring, starring Naomi Watts. Ringu is based upon a novel, also Japanese, titled Ringu or The Ring. I first saw the american film, but not in theaters as the premise seemed too silly for my tastes. A killer video tape? really? I was sorry I had missed it in the theaters as The Ring turned out to be a very good horror film. A fairly low body count, and very little violence, this was not a butcher’s bill of hormone addled teenagers being watched for their sins, not was this a torture-porn of pure sadism, this was a film about knowing your end is coming and having no options to avoid it. The horror evolved from the characters and the nature of their dilemma not from how gruesome the murders were.

Having enjoyed The Ring I was determined to hunt down the source material. I purchased a collection off Amazon of 4 Ringu films on DVD. The movie had been enough of a success in Japan to spawn a sequel, a prequel and then a  revised prequel that retconned elements tha fan objected to in the previous prequel. (Ahh if only we could get Lucas to listen to us.) I also tracked down the original novel, albeit an English translation as I do not read Japanese.

Ringu is a throughly enjoyable horror film. If you have seen The Ring then you will recognized the major elements of sweep of Ringu, however there are differences that make each film throughly unique. In The Ring there is no explanation for why Rachel’s son, Aidan, is such an odd child. In Ringu there is an entire element, taken from the novel, dealing with ESP and psionic ability that explained why the main characters react the way they do and just what is at the heart of Sada’s curse. Also the Japanese film plays with a more explicit supernatural element than the American movie. Both versions abandon sub-plots from the novel, including the explanation for why the curse works in the manner it does. (it deals with if I remember correctly the polio virus and was never a satisfactory element for my tastes.)

Interestingly all film versions replace the male protagonist with a female protagonist. I find it interesting that the switch occurred though I suspect the American and Korean (yes, there is a Korean version as well) well simply following the Japanese film more than the novel.

Ringu is well acted, directed, and photographed, playing for a subtle horror that ignore the temptation of special effects make=up in favor of strong performances and suspenseful scenes.

For anyone who enjoys horror and for whom subtitles are not a barrier to suspension of disbelief, Ringu is a film I heartily recommend.

Share

Sunday Night Movie: Primer

Well this is sort of a Sunday Night Movie post. You see I did not finish this film and I have returned it to Netflix unfinished.

I heard about Primer at a couple of SF cons where people said good things about this odd little time travel film. It’s about a couple of engineers who accidentally build a time machine in their garage. (apparently they were going for anti-gravity so it’s not like they aim small anyway.)

This film is short, just 77 minutes long and I think the filmmakers have disdain for the three act structure of narrative: Establishment, Conflict, Resolution. I watched more than half of the film, about 40 minutes, and so far no hint of conflict and what establishment there was mainly concerned their engineer speak. It was literally like 40 min of Star Trek techonobabble and zero character. I mean that. When I stopped the disc and went to bed last night I could not name the characters, I could not tell you anything about their personality or natures beyond they were engineers and one was apparently married. (Or living together with his GF and their daughter.) I could not say if he loved his wife, if it was a loveless marriage, if he adored her or had grown bored, nothing. As far as I could tell you take one of the pair and have them switch lines with the other and it would make not one iota of difference.

I stopped just after they started traveling in time to make money on the stock market. Really, once they started time traveling my interest grew less. For me to care about what happened I need to care about them and they weren’t people to me, they were walking talking exposition.

Well that’s my opinion and I am sticking to it.

Share

Sunday Night Movie: It!

Technically this is a Sunday Evening Movie that I watched with my sweetie-wife. I had suffered a migraine attack on Sunday night, and while the wonder medication takes care of the pain, I was left too tired to stay up very late.

It! Is a British film from 1967, so this is not the film with Tim Curry as a terrifying clown.

Roddy McDowall stars as Arthur Pimm a deeply disturbed assistant museum curator. After a devastating fire ruins the artifacts stored at the museum’s warehouse, the curator and Pimm discover a medieval statue undamaged in the rubble. Well, the curator ends up dead and we the audience knows that something is very amiss with that statute.

What made this film so very interesting to me is that the central character, Arthur Pimm, is such a deeply flawed and mentally ill character. Many films will start out with a weak character, and under the pressure and temptation of power, glory, and sex or love, they crack and give in, performing vile deeds until poetic justice at long last catches up with them in the film’s climax. Within very few minutes with It!, we know that this is not the case for Pimm. Pimm’s train derailed long before we met him.  Pimm’s introduction very quickly puts him into Norman Bates territory.

Pimm is frustrated professionally, he’s considered too young for the Curator position and is passed over, frustrated sexually, infatuated with a woman who seems unaware of his crush, and unable to cut the apron string from his mother, when a handsom confident American enters the scene, making eyes at Pimm’s crush it is too much for the young man. Discovering the power of the statue, Pimm goes beyond mad into barking at the moon, bat-shit crazy.

While I enjoyed this film, it can be a bit slow. that said any film that ends with a tactical nuke is not all bad.

If you netflix this one it will come on a dis with a second movie, The Shuttered Room. Do Not Watch. I warned you.

Share

Sunday Night Movie: ZARDOZ

A day late the Sunday Night Movie feature has returned. I was in an experiment mood Sunday night and decided to watch an SF film that I had heard much about but never had seen myself, ZARDOZ. This was certainly something different and in many way is a pretty decent example of the trajectory that SF films were on until the assault on our senses that is Star Wars. (Don’t misunderstand me I like Star Wars, I own a copy of the original trilogy, granted the mucked up version, but far better that than the prequels.)

Sf film by the 70s had begun to be seen as vehicle where important subject, where challenging subject, could be raised and tackled in an adult manner. While there was still monster and adventure flicks, a lot of SF in the 70s was about something and written with thinking adults in mind, Zardoz, for all its flaws, it just such a movie.

Zardoz is set in a far distant future with radically different cultures than the one of the filmmakers and the audience. Instead of presenting Wester Civilization, usually American, as the sole culture of the Future, Zardoz presents us with two very startlingly different culture.

There are the Eternals, a small isolated population of people forever young and undying. Even murder and accident cannot keep an Eternal dead at the nearly magical technology housed in the Tabernacle grows a new body and implants for all effective purposes a backup personality and memory into the new, also Eternal, person. Outside the Vortex where the eternals live life is savage, brutal and short, the people there are called Brutals and, they have no technology at all save what is delivered to them by their god, Zardoz, and what Zardoz delivers is weaponry, instructing his followers to  murder and to always remember that ‘The Penis is evil and the Gun is good.”

Sean Connery is a Brutal named Zed who by cunning and daring penetrates the forcefield surrounding the vortex, invading the world of the Eternals. There his presence is disruptive. A world that has known nothing new in literally centuries is thrown into turmoil by murder and questions about the Brutals and what they might mean for the etrnals own future.

There is a lot to make fun in this Film, mocking comes easy when someone tries to talk seriously in such a manner, but I would advise you to look closer. This film is very much a product of its time, the use of psi powers is very much a 70s trope, the very limited special effect due to budget and capability detract from the attempt, but the attempt was a worthy one. This is a film about what it means to be human, what do we owe each other, and the terrible price of lifeboat ethics.

If you have not seen it and you like SF films that have more bite than fluff, then see Zardoz, but try to avoid spoilers if you can.

 

 

Share

Sunday Night Movie: Frankenstein (1931)

I have been feeling unwell all weekend. IT started with a sore throat on on friday that felt really bad on Saturday and by Sunday left me congested and coughing. Given all of that I knew I would not have the endurance for a full two hours or more picture, so I opted for an older and shorter film to watch, Frankenstein.

The 1931 production of Frankenstein is  a very short film, just 70 minuets from start to end and while it deviates wildly from the original text, what can you expect when they can’t get the original author’s credit correct,  it is still one of the best productions based upon that classic novel.

Of course you would have had to lived your life in a very deep and dark cultural hole to not know the basics of the story of Frankenstein. Dr. Frankenstein, in this production named Henry instead of Victor, obsessed with life and death, pursues dangerous and forbidden experiments seeking to create life in a body that has never known life. Robbing execution yards, universities, and graveyards for his materials Frankenstein allows no law and no morality to sway or hinder his experimentation. Aided by his hunchbacked lab assistant Fritz, nope not Igor, Ygor as it is spelled in Son of Frankenstein, doesn’t show up for a couple of films yet,  Henry’s fiance Elizabeth, concerned by the strange and incomprehensible letters she has received from her groom-to-be enlisted the assistance of their best friend, Victor, who in the novel was named Henry, and together the Dr, Frankenstein’s former college mentor, they barge in just as Henry is ready to revivify — or should we vivify — the target body. Continue reading

Share