Tag Archives: Culture

Mini-Review 3: Hell’s Highway: The True Story of Highway Safety Films

If you are of a certain age when you took driving education courses in high school, they likely showed bloody films of auto accidents in class, explicit images of corpses and Hells Highwayinjured people as they were removed from the wreckage. These films were meant as a shock treatment, hopefully piercing the veil of teenage invincibility and instilling a a little caution behind the wheel. No one really knows if they worked, but if you saw these films in school you remember them.

Hell’s Highway is the story of Highway Safety Films Inc, the people that produced these safety movies, and many other training film you are unlikely to have seen. This documentary is not for the squeamish. It replays several graphic scenes from these movies, scenes of real death, real injury, and real agony. However if you can tolerate these bis, it is a fascinating exploration of the people and their mission. It is a time capsule of how things used to work, and how we used to think. I was never bored and found this movie engrossing.

Share

Mini-Review 2: Forks Over Knives

Those who know me know that I am a meat eater. I love a good steak, well cooked chicken, or moist tasty chops, so to find myself watching a film about the advantages of a vegetarian diet was quite surprising.220px-Forks_Over_Knives_movie_poster

The premise of the film is that the Western diet, heavy in animal material, is bad in terms of health outcomes for people, leading to diabetes, heart disease, and cancers, and that a diet based on plants yields better outcomes. To support the premise the filmmakers utilized a number of lines of evidence.Primarily two medical doctors who have been researching this line of thought for years, the doctor’s patient’s as case studies, and large population studies, particularly in the east as diet there has changed from  one based on traditional meals heavy in plants to one more like the west and heavy in meats, and dairy.

Continue reading

Share

Mini-Review Number 1: Media Malpractice: How Obama Got Elected and Palin Was Targeted

These reviews are not in the order I watched them in, but in just whatever random order they occur to me in terms of what I want to talk about.

This documentary was the least satisfying of all those that I completed. (I will not review any based on a partial viewing, that is not fair to the filmmakers or anyone reading the review.) Media MalpracticeThe premise of the film is that the media, because of a liberal bias, failed to due their due diligence in vetting Obama as a presidential candidate,facilitating his election and damaging the republic. Perhaps this argument could be strongly made, but John  Ziegler is not the filmmaker to do it.

This documentary is composed of two major elements. The first element is John Ziegler showing clips from the media coverage of the 2008 presidential election, and narrates in voice over his interpretation of what the clips mean. He doesn’t support the arguments with facts, or testimony, but simply keeps pouring on more and more clips with more and more of his views in what the clips show about the people who made them. There are times when he seems fairly on target and other times when it strikes me as Oz in Buffy would say ‘a radical reintrupretation of the text.’ Without supporting evidence it’s John stating his opinion over and over. Very unpersuasive. Continue reading

Share

Dangerous Musings

First off let me state that I am not a Christian nor am I by far an expert in Christian Theology. I know what I heaver learned I Sunday School, and a lifetime of fascination with humanity and its religion in general. However, snark aside, I don’t see where my reasoning if wrong.
In God’s glorious and perfection heaven, this is no evil and nothing can be wrong. For those who are saved, and therefore absolved of their earthly sins, heaven is a timeless infinity in the presence of your loved one, provided that they were also saved, and God’s eternal, merciful, and loving spirit,
Love is God’s greatest gift, and it is not only expected but required that we love one another, but the love of spouse is an elevated love, it is a love created by the special bonds that ties you to another person for life. It is expressed by a commitment to that person, and that person alone, forsaking all others. In the traditional Christian view, marriage is a lifetime vow, broken only by death.
Death does however break it, and those who have tragically lost their spouse are not excluded from the matrimonial love, but are allowed to marry again, recommitting their vows ‘until death do them part.’ The dangers of childbirth, no greatly reduced by modern medicine and clean hands, robbed many a family of their mother and many a man of his wife, creating the need for the second wife, the step-mother.
In heaven you are reunited with your loved who preceded you into God’s graces. That means you must be reunited with your previous spouses, whom you did love unto death, and you will be joined by the spouses you left behind when you passed away. In heaven many will live forever in perfect harmonious polyamarous relationships. What is good in heaven cannot be evil on earth. Evil and wrongness have no place in God’s grace, therefore poly relationships built upon love and respect can only mirror God’s will for the afterlife of the just and cannot be considered immoral , unnatural, or sinful, but only a proper expression of his divine plan on earth as it is in heaven.
For the record I am not poly either, but the logic still seems watertight to me.

Share

This is different

I watched Apollo 17 lift off in the night, taking our brave men on the final American trip to the moon. I know that we went, but lots of people like to believe that it was all faked. Here’s an excellent take down of that stupid stupid idea, from a perspective I had not seen before. It’s about 15 minutes, but worth it.

Share

Mass Murder and Our Culture

There is no doubt that America suffers a high rate of spree killings than other nations.  A lot of attention is given to the number and availability of firearms in this country because of this, but I believe that this is looking at symptoms and not causes. After all Switzerland has lots of firearms and doesn’t have the problem. The problem and the causes are far deeper than the tools used to create the effect.

The primary cause in my opinion is that we are a culture that venerates the concept of righteous revenge.  Revenge is often the motivation of both our heroes and our villains. Continue reading

Share

James Bond in the 21st Century

This short little essay will have some slight spoilers for the newest Bond film, ‘Skyfall,’ so precede if you don’t mind that minor aspect of my prattling.

James bond has been around for quite a while, the novel that started the franchise, Casino Royale was published in 1953 and inspired film spanning from 1962 with ‘Dr. No’ to this year’s entry ‘Skyfall’. The world has been through a lot of changes over those decades. Enemies have vanished from the globe – Soviet what? — and technology has made earlier gee-whiz gadget seem down right Neolithic. Bond as a character has made a few adaptation with the changing times. The man’s man drinking and sleeping his way through a bevy of beauties has become a colder character, less given to quips when killed. However it is one exchange, one line in ‘Skyfall’ that shows that the world has truly changed and Bond along with it.

In the film Bond has been captured by bad guy Silva and finds himself tied, again, to chair. This time he’s allowed to keep his clothes, unlike that unsetting scene from 2006’s Casino Royale. Silva, carrying a fair amount of personal animosity for Bond and his boss M, tries to upset his captive with some very explicit homoerotic foreplay. The scenes is sexually charged and suddenly changes when Bond says, “What makes you think this is my first time?” (And a million fanfics are born)

Either Bond lied to throw off Silva’s game, or Bond’s sexually experience is wider than what has been traditionally represented. No matter which is ‘true’, how meaningless that term is for any fiction, the importance is massive.

For most of American culture, historically effeminate natures, and homosexuality has been associated with this, have been seen as weak and unmanly. To be a man in western culture, certainly for the twentieth century, has meant to be strong and to be heterosexual without and wavering. (Or as they put it in the satire Rustler’s Rhapsody to be a good guy you had to be ‘a confident heterosexual.’ heterosexual was not enough)

If Bond is lying, he’s open and accepting enough to have people think he might have had trysts with other men. He doesn’t see it as something that weakens his standing as an alpha male. If it is true, he’s accepting that his tastes, or at least experiences, in bed as only one aspect to who he is and that there is nothing shameful in open mindedness.

What is more interesting is that the filmmakers were willing to go there. It’s one thing for an art house release to have male characters of non-standard sexual orientation, or secondary characters in major films, but to have your principle action stare, a defining action hero of the last 50 years identified that way would have been just a few years ago forbidden.  It simply would not have been prudent to risk all that money by inviting the controversy that the character might have had sex with another man. Unimportant to the story, lose it and save the box office would have been the commandment from the studio. Not in ‘Skyfall.’

We are in a different world now. A more open a more accepting world. I welcome it.

Share

Thoughts on the 2012 Election

 Well the election hascome and gone, the Republicans failed to dislodge an incumbent during a lackluster economy and gave up seats in the Senate, but managed to retain their control of the House of Representative.

Three states expanded marriage equality.

Two states have started directly challenging the Federal government on Marijuana.

One southern state turned back an assault on personal physical sovereignty. (I despise the idea of abortion rights, or women’s rights, there are no group rights, only individual rights; the right to decide which elective procedure you have or not done to your body is an issue of person physical sovereignty.)

A territory indicated a desire to become a state.

All in all it was an interesting night of results, so who are the big winners and the big losers?

 

LOSERS:

The Republicans Party: hanging onto just the house was not enough. The AC A is law and it will stay that way.  2014 Will see the exchanges and then the states that are resisting the exchanges will have to answer to their citizen why they can’t insurance.

Social Conservatives: A whole slate of pro-life candidates lost as their absolutist positions collided with a younger and more tolerate electorate.

Statistical Doubters:  If nearly every poll is pointing against your position, and you insist that all the polls are biased, you probably aren’t engaging with reality.

Mitt Romney: He sold his soul, became whatever he thought he needed to be, switched positions more often than a prostitute and in end lost.

 

WINNERS:

Barack Obama: He avoided the stigma of becoming a one term president. In a climate hostile to re-election he and his team worked the numbers and followed the path to victory.

Nate Silver: 50 for 50 on his state by state projections, and on target with his popular vote predictions. To a lesser degree the pollsters won, catching an unusual voting population that few expected.

The Gay Community: Marriage equality in three states, with popular votes, would be enough to declare a victory, but they also elected the first openly lesbian senator. The times, and the culture, they are a changing.

Young People: Derided as a fluke in 2008 they not only returned to the polls to vote, but increased their number. (I wonder how much Facebook and Social Media played in that. I saw a contestant stream of political messages and urges to vote. If peer pressure is brought consistently to voting then the young vote may be here to stay.)

Women: A record number of women now serve in the senate, including a first, an all female delegation in the House. They beat back attacks on their personal sovereignty rights, and increased their vote share.

Share