Streaming Horror: Scream, Blacula, Scream

The past several nights I watched the 1973 blaxploitation horror film Scream, Blacula, Scream. A sequel the previous year’s movie Blacula about an old-world African vampire played by the incomparable William Marshall, and depending on how geeky you are you may know him best from the Star Trek (Original Series) episode The Ultimate Computer as Daystrom the inventor of the M-5 computer, that arrives in an American urban center instigating a plague of vampirism before meeting his end at the hero’s hand.

Scream, Blacula, Scream, starts with a Voodoo congregation in turmoil as their high priestess passes without naming her successor and two devotees contend for her title, Willis, the self-important son of the priestess, and Lisa, played by Pam Grier, who is more popular with the congregation. Willis, unable to endure his rejection invokes dark magics and unwittingly reanimated Blacula initiating a new cycle of vampirism.

Not as sharp or as on point as its predecessor this film in many respects moves too quickly. Lisa’s lover, Justin, a police detective moves from skeptic to vampire hunter with too much ease and the political among the congregation was brushed aside far too quickly for something that had been introduced with the elements of a major plot development.

That said, I enjoyed this movie. Marshall’s command of every scene in which he appears is unquestioned and he brings a tragic dignity to his African prince that was cursed for confronting the slave trade. Pam Grier, one of the stars to emerge from the blaxploitation cycle, isn’t given a lot of the stuff to do as an actress but she takes this meager meal and gives us a banquet of a performance.

Side comment; while watching this film I realized that Pam Grier is a nearly perfect image for the character Sakita Bergen in my military sf series I am

American International Picture

writing. I shall have to keep that in mind.

In the end this movie suffers from being rushed to screen and doesn’t compare favorably to its progenitor piece but it is still worth at least one viewing.

Share

Why It’s Necessary to Say, ‘Black Lives Matter.’

As protests, unrest, and repression continues throughout this country over the killing of George Floyd the unifying chant heard from protesters is ‘Black Live Matter.’ The Chat did not start with this protest but is sadly years old and is likely to be carried forward for years to come.

A common response from those in disagreement is ‘All Lives Matter,’ and less common but more contentious is the response ‘Blue Lives Matter.’ Both of these responses miss the point and the reason for why the BLM movement exists at all.

The terrible truth of the matter is that black lives are valued less by our society and our culture than other lives. In terms of income, wealth, education, justice, health, voting, and in life expectancy, it is painfully clear that societally black lives simply do not count as much, commanding far less attention for injustices of all kinds visited upon and receiving far less resources to address their troubles. To say ‘Black Lives Matters’ is to say that these devalued should be valued. It is not taking lives that are equally valued and placing them above the rest, which is the implication of the response ‘All Lives Matter,’ it is trying to remove the blinders that keeps many people from seeing the terrible price black lives pay for merely existing in our society.

“Blue Lives Matter’ is beyond wrong it is egregious and a perversion of the argument. First off there are no ‘blue lives,’ policeperson is a chosen identity not one assigned by accident of birth or societal bigotry. Every cop out there chooses to be a cop a choice that is incomparable to race. Secondly, ‘blue lives’ are more valued in our society that other lives. Crimes against the police are punished more heavily than comparable crimes against average citizens. (NOT civilians, the police are civilians and the use of that term to describe non-police is part of the police’s culture of occupation that is exacerbating all of our problems.) In terms of valorization and resources police are valued far above nearly every other for of public employee and citizen.

It is a terrible thing that we must say ‘Black Lives Matter’ because is it an indictment of how far short we have fallen of our lofty cultural goals.

 

Share

Columbia Noir: Human Desire

This weekend I continued my exploration of the Criterion Channel’s collection Columbia Noir with Human Desire.

Human Desire is the story of Jeff Warren (Glenn Ford), recently returned home from the Korean War and now resuming his job as a locomotive engineer. In his absence the Assistant Yard Supervisor Buckley, (Broderick Crawford) has married a much younger woman Vicki, (Gloria Grahame.) Before long there is jealousy, robbery, and murder the staples of American Noir. This is very much like the descriptionprovided by the Criterion Channel and it is in my opinion

dŽsirs humains
human desire
1954
rŽal : Fritz Lang
Broderick Crawford
Gloria Grahame
Glen Ford
Collection Christophel

quite misleading and capture where I think the film took its initial and consequential misstep. The entire movie is told from Jeff’s point of view treating the unfolding events as principally his story and it really isn’t his at all. The story should have been written and presented from Vicki’s point of view. When Buckley, a brute and intellectually challenged man, is fired from his position it falls to Vicki to win him his job back but in doing so triggers his violent jealousy launch a series of events that will entangle Buckley, Vicki, and Jeff in robbery and murder as she desperately tries to survive.

Despite its erroneous point of view Human Desire is a film worth watching. Glenn Ford plays the sort of role that he is best known for the fundamentally decent man though in keep with noir’s traditions he has a difficult time resisting temptation. Broderick Crawford as Buckley convincingly gives us both a man who is dangerous and unpredictable but also deeply flawed and trapped by his own self-doubted that is amplified by his alcoholism, but the real star of this film is the luminous Gloria Grahame. Grahame’s realistic portrayal of a woman desperate to escape her circumstances using the means and methods at her disposal without sliding across into evil is a wonder to behold.  Grahame appeared in many great noirs and died too young at 57 but her star continues to shine bright through her performances such as this one. Direct by Fritz Lang is a competent film though a number of plot threads were either never completed or are used simply as audience misdirection. Particular attention in the story is paid to a distinctive watch and yet that element never closes back to a resolution.

Overall, I enjoyed watching Human Desire but I have no desire to add it permanently to my library.

Share

No Real Posting Today

I don’t want every post to be political but at the moment my brain is working on nothing else.

Riots only appear spontaneous, they are the result of long term pressures and the current one are no different.

Not much else to say this morning.

Share

Could Trump Play a ‘Stabbed in the Back’ Card?

In his mind Trump never loses. Any loss is always either a secret win that he spins with enormous lies or a result of ‘cheating’ and betrayals. Everyone, including Trump himself, was ready for his endless and utterly false claims of having won the 2016 when it was expected that he could not win. But he did win. A think margin of 70,000 votes in less than a handful of states put him into the presidency and created the conditions of our current chaos.

At moment Trump is running for re-election and in national polls and in the battleground states he is losing to Biden. Moreover, he has never held a lead over Biden during this entire race and with the triple threat of a global pandemic, an economic crisis, and civil unrest the prospect for Trump to take the lead is rather slim. Not impossible mind you but the electoral map does not look good for team Trump.

Given that the map is threatening and Trump’s ego requires that he does not lose I wonder if there is a possibility that he’s going to turn the campaign ship and run it aground.

Not as a ‘quitter’ because that too runs afoul of his over-inflated ego, but could some action, particularly an action taken by the Republican party or elites, such as not having a crowd packed convention, provide him with an excuse that the ‘deep state’ and ‘corrupt elites’ have stabbed him and ‘the country’ in the back and he then drops out of the race?

It was on March 31 when LBJ stood down from his second full term and left the Democratic party in a shambles and Trump has less concern for his party than any party leader in history. He wouldn’t care that a summer declination to run would trash the GOP, all that matters to him is his ego. Before the August Convention the GOP will not have officially nominated anyone as their candidate, leaving open the possibility that it could be someone else.

I am not saying that this is a likely scenario but as we have seen so far in 2020 unlikely is far from impossible.

 

Share

A Thousand Little Compromises

A friend on Facebook asked how was that conservatives were disgusted and ashamed by this presidency and its horrific actions.

The truth of the matter is that is a very human things to do to turn a blind eye towards one’s tribe and one’s self when looking for flaws and hypocrisy and simultaneously be hyper-aware of the same things in others. Understanding this requires understanding that people rarely go from one extreme to another in a single leap but rather get there by a thousand little steps, justifying, if they think about it at all, as unpleasant actions and compromises taken for a greater good. Think back upon Saruman in The Fellowship of the Ring, “Our goals need not change only our methods.”

That element of goals is critically important, it is what allows someone to accept the unacceptable because the destination is worth it. Of course, this is the classic ‘the ends justify the means,’ and that so often leads to terrible consequences but it is difficult to see that slow corruption in one’s self and it is equally difficult to admit error particularly for anything of high personal importance. So, when someone of your team acts in a dishonorable manner, cheats, or is abusive it is far easier to excuse it, justify it, or point an accusing finger back at the opponents than face the painful truth of what you have even tacitly supported.

However, this has limits and eventually people either abandon their previously held truths for new ones or they abandon the tribes associated with their previous selves and both are ruptures of identity.

Among conservatives you can watch this process in action. Some have gone silent, simply no longer associating with the tribe as it currently stands, some have abandoned the tribe and formed their own new identity, the ‘never Trumpers,’ and some have adopted the uniform of their new movement, washing away their former ideals. It is wrong to think of conservatives as a single monolithic block and the same is true for any very large ideology. The reactions among conservatives is varied but the political party and its apparatus is firmly in the control of a single faction, Trump’s, and it would be best not to confuse the larger collection with the party.

 

Share

Just a Few Thoughts

I don’t have a lot of time and there is prose writing to be done but I have a few thoughts to share.

 

It is abundantly clear that in the nation we have a police brutality problem. Far too often they act as occupiers with the rest of the population subjugated.

It is also abundantly clear that systemic racism amplifies this brutality and black and brown people suffer disproportionately because of it.

The president in the words of a conservative podcaster ‘fetishizes brutality,’ and his most devoted followers fetishize his illusionary strength.

That which cannot be endured will not be. All people, individually and collectively, have their breaking points and when those are reach chaos predictably follows.

People who so confidently asserted that the GOP 94 victory averted a ‘civil war’ will remain blind to the causes of the current unrest.

And finally;

This is all far from over.

 

Share

Italian Genre Cinema, Home Edition: Caliber 9

The COVID-19 crisis among other things stopped could the Film Geeks San Diego’s year-long presentation of Italian Genre Films that my sweetie-wife and I were enjoying so much. So, while we wait for the crisis to pass, we have been scrounging streaming services for gems of Italian Genre movie from the 70s and earlier. Last night we watched Caliber 9 1972.

I would classify Caliber 9 as an Italian neo-noir. It stars Gastone Moschin as Ugo Piazza a small time mobbed up crook just released from three years in prison. Unfortunately for Ugo both the police and the local crime boss, Mikado, believe that Ugo took part in the theft of 300 hundred thousand American dollars from the mob and that he has the money stashed away. Even Ugo’s girlfriend Nelly, played by Barbara Bouchet, thinks he stole the cash. When Mikado puts a particularly brute thug Rocco on point for finding out where Ugo has hidden the loot, thing begin to spiral out of control leading to murder and Ugo’s quest for revenge.

While the quality of these 70s era Italian exploitative movie can vary a great deal I thoroughly enjoyed Caliber 9. This film has a gritty, realism to it that helped sell the story to betrayal, greed, and fractured loyalties. It is not surprising that there is a re-make currently in post-production slated for a release this year, but between the trouble with foreign producers finding American distribution and the pandemic who knows if we’ll get a chance to see that in theaters at all. It’s a nice tip of the hat to the original that Barbara Bouchet will be appearing in the remake.

Caliber 9 is currently streaming on Amazon as one of the movies available to Prime Members.

Share

It Always Matters

Six years ago, after a meeting of the writers’ group I belong to one of the members voiced the opinion that in the3 USA who you voted for did not matter as all the politicians were effectively the same. It was another instance of cynicism masquerading as wisdom. The next presidential election presented the choices between an experienced candidate who had spent their entire life in the arena of publica service and narcissistic game show host with no experience in politics, service, or empathy. Today we are paying the price for selecting the game show host and pretending that the choices were in any way equivalent.

As of this week more than 100,0000 American have died of the COVID-19 pandemic and the crisis is far from over. When the news began filtering out of China, there were those in the administration that tried to sound alarms, tried to ready the nation and the government for a crisis but their leadership shut their eyes and plugged their ears pretending the crisis did not exist. When the outbreak became undeniable the nation was plunged, state by state, into an economic coma, throwing tens of millions out of work and destroying more than a decade’s growth but that might have been the right choice if the time it purchased had not been wasted. The ‘shut down’ was not the tool that would by itself suppress and mitigate the pandemic it was there to buy time so that the real tools, testing and tracing could be brought to the front and deployed against the enemy.

Again, the leadership failed the public. There was no mass mobilization for either testing or tracing. There wasn’t even coordination of efforts across the federal system but rather the opposite, states were pitted against states and against the Federal government itself. At least one state deploying its guard to protect incoming vital medical supplies not from bandits but from the Federal government coming in and confiscating the supplies for itself.

So now we are beginning to revive the comatose economy and we still do not have adequate levels of testing and we do not have the capacity to contact traces outbreaks. The best we can hope for is that the curve does not go up again but that we can keep the rate of infection and death level. If we do that, forestall any increase as people venture out and are forced back to their employment weather it is safe or not, then we can expect another 100,000 dead Americans by the end of the year. We will be near a quarter of a million dead Americans and for what?

For conservative judges?

For tax breaks on capitol?

What conservative gain is worth the lives of hundreds of thousands of American lives?

(Side note: Sweden did not put its economy into a coma and it is seeing as of this morning the first signs of economic growth, but it has a death rate from COVID-19 of 4.55 per million and the USA’s is 3.55 per million. Had the US followed that course it would have produced another 28,000 corpses.)

Share

Land of the Minotaur AKA The Devil’s Men

This will be quick. My sweetie-wife found a film she wanted to watch during our 30-day free trial of Fandor, The Devil’s Men US Title Land of the Minotaur.  Starring Peter Cushing and Donald Pleasance this is a Greek horror film about a minotaur-worshipping cult that abducts college students willy nilly and has a young girl kill them in sacrifices to their half bull half man god. Pleasance is a local Irish priest with an accent that is never very good and often disappears entirely while Cushing is an expat Hungarian noble with a wholly English accent that is the high priest of the murderous cult.

Roger Ebert called this ‘the worst Peter Cushing Film ever,’ but we think both Shockwaves and The Uncanny can give this poorly crafted film a run for that title. I have never seen a movie directed with such a lack of spatial awareness, scenes get turned around, characters are unaware of the geography around them and there is nothing in this movie to recommend it. During the climax of the story the priest informs the young heroic man helping him that they must get there before moonrise when their friends will be sacrificed, never mind that there have been loads already without that full moon, now they have a ticking clock. The companion asks how does the priest know this? It’s a good question because absolutely nothing that happened before this clued either the character or the audience to this suddenly critical fact. The priest’s answer? “I just Know.” He might as well have said, “The writer told me!”

 

Share