Mulholland Dr and Narrative Logic

 

I have now added to my ever-growing Blu-ray and DVD collection David Lynch’s 2001 protean production Mulholland Dr and it has been considering the nature of logical order in film and fiction.

Fiction generally behaves in accordance with its own internal and decipherable narrative logic that allows the reader or audience to suspend disbelief and accept the characters and events are credible representations of some reality. This spans the gauntlet from grounded ‘realistic’ dramas such as The Remains of the Day to fantastic and physics defying spectacles like Avengers: Endgame. The cause-and-effect logic of the story dictates the progression of the characters actions, emotions, and growth with a clear and understanding relationship between event and outcome.

Mulholland Dr abandons all sense of narrative logic in favor of dream logic. The audience is denied a firm, clear, foundation of logical rules by which the film operates leaving them swept by the currents of imagery, raw emotion, and sound into a whirlpool that each individual is solely responsible for interpreting. The film is most often compared directly to a dream where major events and sequences have only the barest of connecting narratives flowing freely from one to another with a logic that feels present but is forever just beyond discovery.

I cannot tell you what Mulholland Dr is about. I cannot give to you a definitive interpretation on what maybe reality and what may be dream if such a distinction even exists within its narrative. It is like Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey but with is cold clinical style replaced by one that is unsettling, disturbing, and even horrifying.

I have seen this film called the best horror movie of the early 2000s and it is hard to argue with that assessment. Horror works best when not only the characters but the audience is forced to face threatening events that defy understanding. The dead do not rise and feed upon the living, magical beasts do not prowl the night, and science has not produced monstrosities savaging the countryside. But eventually in horror films and fiction the new rules are discovered, the vampire must rest on earth from its grave, the uncompleted tasked finished so the spirits my rest, the nature of the beast is understood and through that defeated returning the world to an order that again rational. Mulholland Drnever resolves its internal logical, the world unbalanced is never again rational, and the unsettled horror of a cold uncaring universe that beyond understanding remains, haunting the audience far beyond the film’s 146-minute running time.

I do not pretend to understand Lynch’s vision but I do feel it and that I think that was his intent all along.

Share

Streaming Review: Stray Dog – A Study in Guilt

 

Starring a young 29- year-old Toshiro Mifune Stray Dog is a 1949 Japanese noir that has its recurring themes guilt and the pressures of societal decay on people without resources.

Rookie homicide detective Murakami tired and suffering from an oppressive heatwave blanketing the city has his pocket picked but instead of taking his wallet the thief makes off with Murakami’s police issues Colt pistol. Murakami dutifully reports the theft already quite guilty about his negligence certain that this will get him booted from the force into a city that has few opportunities as the nation crawls out of the destruction, physical and emotional, of the war.

Partnered with veteran policeman Sato (Takashi Shimura) the pair begin following leads to identify the thief and recover the stolen gun. The hunt leads them down a trail of petty crimes growing more serious and more dangerous as they penetrate the underbelly of the city’s criminal element. With each crime the pistol is tied to Murakami’s guilt grows as he takes on more and more responsibility for its abuse by the criminals. Simultaneously he develops an empathy for many of the people he encounters, people for whom the harsh realities of the nation have trapped in lives of desperation and shattered illusions.

An early film by renowned director Akira Kurosawa Stray Dog has clear inspirations from the American genre of film noir while still presenting the themes and imagery that is iconic to Kurosawa’s film legacy. Mifune here presents a different sort of character than the gruff and imposing types he would often be associated with later in his equally impressive career. Murakami is a sensitive man and it’s said many time in the film perhaps too sensitive for policework but it is this quality and Mifune’s excellent portrayal of it that provides the bridge that allows the audience to see the crushed humanity in the city’s underworld.

Stray Dog is an excellent example of the universality of noirand that the human conditions it comments upon are universal rather than national and I can heartily recommend watching it.

Stray Dog is currently streaming on The Criterion Channel.

Share

Pedestals Are for Things Not People

 

With the flood of new support for Charisma Carpenter and Ray Fisher as they recount abusive and toxic environments on sets under the control of Joss Whedon it is important to remember that any artistic creator no matter how beloved their work are fallible flawed messy human beings not statuary icons of platonic virtue.

One can adore an artist’s work such as Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Harry Potter, or Chinatown and still recognized and condemn the creator for their actions or unjust philosophies.

It is equally justifiable to refuse to engage with their art if the offense is beyond a pale you can accept. That is a line that each person must determine for themselves.

Wherever you draw your personal line of embargo it is important long before that moment before the horrible revelations come to light that you do not place these people on the pedestals of adoration, that is where the art belongs, but always remind yourself that no matter the touching nature of their creations they people and that  good art can come from bad people.

Share

I Write Lean

 

As I approach the end of the first draft of my new novel I am once again struck with thoughts on my own writing process.

Many sf/fantasy novels today are well north of 100,000 words and yet my own works tend to land around that mark or under. Vulcan’s Forge (available from all booksellers) was a slim 80,000 and generally well-reviewed and the feedback I got was that the exposition was deft and sufficient so it would not appear that I am shortchanging on conveying my world-building to readers.

It is simply that I write lean. This is not to say I write better or worse than authors who have much larger works. It is a function of both plot and style not of quality. I find that in my editing and even in my critiquing I tend to be an advocate of cutting out words, phrases, or sentences for more direct writing.

I think this stylistic approach is in part a development that sprung from my lifelong love of film. Cinema is by its nature a very lean form of storytelling. While producing longer books os more expensive that cost increase is nothing compared to the fantastic cost of making a feature length film. This constraint presses on production to tell their stories in the simplest, leanest, method possible that can still achieve the artistic vision of the film. It is perhaps the single most identifiable element of my voice. (Someone else would have to speak to that matter I seem constitutionally incapable of seeing hearing my own voice in my fiction.)

I am quite comfortable with my lean prose and writing and hopefully others will be as well.

Share

Not Worth Your Time: Hello Mary Lou; Prom Night 2

 

The 80s were a good time and a bad time for horror films. The monumental success in the late 70s of Halloween inspired innumerable low budget film makers and studios that a cheap slasher was the sure path to box office riches producing a crop of under-funded knockoffs that possessed none of the style of the films they were following. 1980 brought the rip-off production Prom Nightwhich had the benefit of starring Jamie Lee Curtis who had starred Halloween but other than that had precious little to offer.

Six years later a wholly different production under the title The Haunting of Hamilton High retooled and retitled itself in Hello Mary Lou; Prom Night 2 a story without any connection to the first Prom Night save that take place in the same high school. Both films are Canadian productions that attempt to present their locals as standard Americana but I could swear that in Prom Night 2 when money is flashed it has a clearly Canadian appearance.

The plot of Prom Night 2 is fairly straight forward, Mary Lou Maloney, an enthusiastic sinner of a high school girl, is killed in an accident on Prom night 1957 before she can be crown as prom queen and 30 years later her vengeful and still sinful spirit descends on the high school thirsting for sex, violence, and her crown.

This is film is a mess.

It rips off so many themes and shots and concepts from other movies that there is scarcely anything in it which it can claim as its own. Trying to merge ideas from The Exorcist, Carrie, and Nightmare on Elm Street proved to be a fool’s errand and aside from Lisa Schrage as Mary Lou and perhaps Michael Ironside there is little to praise in the acting presented to us. The lines are delivered without conviction or credibility while being shot in a flat over-lit video style. There is nothing to recommend this film and its gratuitous use of female nudity reveals not only the actresses but the production desperate attempt to drawn in an audience as low class as the production itself.

Hello Mary Lou; Prom Night 2 is currently streaming on Shudder.

Share

Second Pfizer Dose

 

Yesterday, now about 23 hours ago, I received the second dose of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine for COVID-19. I count myself extremely lucky that workers in the health care industry, though I do not directly interact with patients or people receiving care, I am eligible to get the vaccine. I have to say that my employers and my union have done an excellent job providing care to our members and patients while protecting the staff and workers throughout our facilities.

As far as adverse events I seem have suffered quite few. I took the day off from work and that was the right call. By late afternoon I experienced muscles aches and possibly a fever but nothing more than that at the time. I was still able to get just over 1000 words down on my novel and attend the virtual meeting of my writers’ group.

This morning I awoke to a minor headache, enough to be annoying but not enough to compel the heavy-duty migraine medication or that I remain home. In about fifteen minutes or so I will leave for work, I am among the few that are working in the office versus working from home, and I expect today to be fairly routine. In one week, I should be at full immunity and be able to relax a little while mourning my dear friend who passed from this pandemic last year far too soon gone from our lives.

 

Share

Streaming Review: The Lodgers

 

With Saint Patrick’s Day fast approaching I was in the mood for some Irish themed horror and something a little more authentic that any film of the Leprechaun franchise. Sunday night I treated myself the 2017’s Irish Gothic horror The Lodgers.

Set in the Irish countryside following World War I the story centers on fraternal twins Rachel and Edward who live in an isolated and decaying manor trapped by a family superstition or curse that compels them to always be in their beds by midnight, never admit a stranger to the home, and never abandon one another. The film opens on their 18th birthday and an unrevealed expectation that is linked to their coming of age. Into this creepy atmospheric situation comes Sean recently returned home from the war facing the dual challenges of having lost a leg and being seen as a traitor for her service to the hated English. Rachel’s blossoming sexual desires, Edward’s terror of leaving the house day or night, the family’s non-existent finances, and Sean’s attraction to Rachel combine for an explosive mixture that threatens the twins with the exposure of their actual natures.

There are many styles of horror films, rampaging monsters, murderous masked killers, and the slow burn mood piece of which The Lodgers falls neatly into. The film is not one with an exaggerated body county and the effects are there to create unsettling imagery rather than memorable kills. It is a film that unwinds with its characters and as each secret is pulled unwillingly from them. Directed by Brian O’Malley The Lodgers takes it’s time in revealing its truths trusting that the audience will be intrigued by the mystery and the dreamlike haunting imagery beautifully photographed by cinematographer Richard Kendrick. The performances by Charlotte Vega and Bill Milner are suitably internalized, matching the gothic nature of the story’s themes of isolation, both physical and social, and repressed nature of the characters.

With a brief running time of 92 minutes The Lodgers does not overstay its welcome nor needlessly meander but rather tells its tale with clean plotting that doesn’t disrupt its sedate pacing. While some reviewers have complained that the films has few ‘scares’ I enjoy a film that expects moods to carry more than a suddenly startling image or sound.

The Lodgers is not for everyone. If your tastes in horror expects more excitement than slow tension it is likely not to your taste but for people who enjoyed Robert Wise’s The Haunting this may be more to their liking.

Update: The Lodger is currently streaming on Amazon Prime Video.

Share

5 Quick Thoughts

 

1) My current Work in Progress novel is rapidly reaching the completion for the first draft. I am currently at 97 thousand words and the story is likely to land between 101 and 106 thousand, then onto the revisions.

2) Resident Alien the SciFi show on Syfy has been pretty entertaining. Quirky characters, fun premise, and a fantastic performance from Alan Tudyk as the extraterrestrial marooned on Earth and masquerading as a doctor is amazing.

3) A deep concern for all my friends and everyone in the massive state of Texas.

4) I get my second dose of the Pfizer vaccine on Monday and I urge everyone to get vaccinated as soon as they are able.

5) Ted Cruz once again displays that not only does have zero concern for the well-being of anyone not in a position to help him but that his intellectual capabilities are hamstrung by his selfish desires and wants. A competent villain would have used the crisis the forge a facade of ability and caring to propel them to greater political power but Cruz is incompetent as he is cruel and spineless.

Share

Rush Limbaugh has Assumed Room Temperature

 

Yesterday, February 17th, 2021, Rush Limbaugh radio/political personality died.

In the mid to late 90s I did listen to his radio program though I could never be called a fan and certainly not a ditto-head, a term for his most devoted followers. During my failed collegiate pursuits, I, for a while, majored in political science and as this blog indicates still have a deep and abiding interest in the political arts, governance, and public policy making at least occasional listening to his program something of interest. It never became a regular experience because even though at the time I was a registered and voting member of the Republican Party Limbaugh did not present reasoned argument from a foundation of logic and solid moral philosophy bur rather engaged in demeaning, cruel, petty, and personal attacks masquerading as humor in place of serious thought. He was not a satirist; he was a bully. Limbaugh’s crude and vicious attitude towards those he perceived as enemies established the moral direction of conservatism and cleared the path for the ascendency of Trump. Today’s ignorant, petty, lying, Republican party devoid of morality or honor is the crop that grew from Limbaugh’s popularity and unchallenged position as the party’s loudest voice. Before he himself went into the grave he first put serious conservatism there leaving behind its idiot and bigoted brother.

There are voices on the right demanding that Limbaugh’s critics restrain their voices and their tone out of respect for the dead. I will not mock or demean him or engaged in petty, puerile, personal attacks not because Limbaugh is deserving of respect but because he is not worth the violation of my manners or principals. Nor will I criticize those who are unleashing their own brands of cruel humor because to demand that this man be treated with a respect he never found for others is hypocrisy that is unmatched. Let him bask in the same respect he showed for his enemies.

He is dead but the wreckage on our political norms from his career lives on.

Share

Needed Reforms

 

 

It is clear that at the Federal level there are some absolutely essential reforms required to our government. There are two that I am think of this morning, one that requires a constitutional amendment and one which does not.

Requiring that we change our constitution is the manner in which we impeach presidents. It is clear in a party driven political system no matter the clear evidence of crimes a political party simply will not impeach its own leader as long as that leader command significant support from the party’s base of voters. General election voters are irrelevant to the calculation as politician understand that must survive the primary before facing the wider pool of voters. As it currently stands impeachment is a dead letter. The solution would be to remove the trial and conviction phase of the process from the politicians to a body more immune to the current political winds such as the Supreme Court. Impeachment would require a simple majority vote in both houses and then be tried before the Supreme Court for conviction and removal. But as I said this requires a Constitutional Amendment, not easy.

The other topic is reforming the Supreme Court. The constitution requires that the United States have a Supreme Court but does not specify it make-up or operation leaving that to the congress. A suggestion I have read and favor is that instead of having a 9-justice court where all the justices participate and rule on every case and thus creating an incentive to pack the court towards one political philosophy or the other expand the court, say to fifteen to reduces the load on each justice, and then every case would be heard by a panel selected randomly for that case. While the larger court could have a partisan tilt, no one could be assured that the panel that hears the case would reflect that. This would reduce the arms race in stacking the court and in running to the court to decide every major issue.

Share