This is a rewatch for me as I saw this during its original theatrical release. Adapted from a novel of the same name by F Paul Wilson The Keep tells the story of an ancient evil trapped in fortress deep in the Carpathian mountains and its attempt to escape during 1941. Occupied by German

Paramount Pictures

Soldiers and SS troops the mysterious entity released greed stalks and slaughters the soldiers. In desperation to discover the truth and to stop the killing the Nazis unwisely bring a Jewish historian and his daughter from a concentration camp who, justly thirsty for revenge, quickly joins forces with the entity, endangering not just the keep, its occupiers, and the surrounding village but humanity at large with the entity’s escape.

The Keep, plagued with production troubles, studio interference, and questionable artistic choices, failed up on release and I recall leaving the theater far from satisfied. In nearly 40 years since its release the film has gathered some praise and a small cult following. Rewatching the feature I can say I have seen far worse horror films, I have watched worse the same week with far better production values, but The Keep still misses the mark and falls short of being an engaging piece.

It is reported that the studio cut more than a half an hour from the film and the sloppy editing shows. After establishing a mood and atmosphere for the story the rough reductions caused the story to skip over the force stalking and killing the soldiers, reducing what should have been building tension and terror into one line of quickly delivered exposition.

With the tone so destroyed by the poor edits the film is further damaged by gaudy and unsubtle special effects. Where a story of this type works more powerfully with less, hints of powers, suggestions of something at the edge of the frame, The Keep went with bright, flashy effects and animation that are incongruous with the rest of the production design. This friction is inflated by the film’s music. Tangerine Dream’s synth infused score destroys more mood that it creates, often overpowering scenes and robbing them of their emotional impact by drawing attention away from the story.

The bones of the film are quite sound and with footage restored, new more subtle effects, and a more appropriate score The Keep might have had a chance to be something fairly interesting but as it is currently formatted it’s a flawed work with a fine cast.

When I first watched the trailer for Barbarian film my initial thoughts were that it looked stupid and uninteresting, and I placed it on my do not bather to see mental listing.

20th Century Studios

Then on Facebook and Twitter I saw from various quarters of the horror community that the film had interesting twists and sociological commentary that couldn’t be explored without spoilers.

Well, with my curiosity engaged I changed my mind and took in a late-night screening this past Friday.

I need to listen to my intuition. This film was bland, and uninteresting and an insult to the audience’s intuitive intelligence.

Every narrative film is fiction and ever fiction has a plausibility envelope. Actions within that envelope are accepted as possible and within the realm of the characters and nature of that fictional world, actions beyond that envelops shatter disbelief and destroy the story’s illusion of reality. The boundaries of plausibility envelop vary with the genre of the story. In a superhero film Drax can be swallowed by a huge beast and emerge unscathed by its digestive acids but in a thriller such as JawsQuint cannot survive the maws of a shark. Dramatic fiction has tight boundaries on its envelopes while fantastic fiction has more distant edges. However, a thriller/horror without supernatural or science-fiction elements to push that envelope has a limited range of actions before disbelief is compromised. Barbarian ignores all constraints of reality and all illusion of reality vanishes like fog on a bright hot day.

In the screening I attended laughter erupted during dramatic moments because no one present could accept anything presented as ‘real.’ The violations of plausibility that I witnessed were not ones restricted to people with advance of obscure knowledge but ones everyone understands as to how the world functions. If person A plummets from a height and person B plummets a moment later, we understand that B lands on A, but Barbarian would have us accept the A ends up atop of B.

Some spoilers follow but honestly you should just skip this movie.

A middle-aged or older woman who has never been properly fed cannot survive being crushed between an automobile and a structure much remain a terminator level of threat. The same malnourished woman cannot simply lift a full-grown man of normal size straight up more than seven feet. If someone falls from fifty or more feet they are not, if they survive, going to stand and walk away.

There is very nearly but not quite a Psycho level twist about half-way through the film’s running time, but unlike Psycho where the hand off to a new set of leads were to characters, we had some establishment and level of engagement with Barbarian throws us cold into a new principal character and one so utterly unlikable you can only root for his demise.

Barbarian wasted my time, precious hours I can never reclaim.

Released in 1975 Jaws, along with Star Wars two years later, created the summer blockbuster. Optioned and sent into development and production before the novel was published Jaws made a superstar director of Steven Spielberg and terrorized a generation. 14 When I came out Jaws was a memorable theater going experience and one my all-time favorite films.

Seven years ago, I attended a screening celebrating the film’s 40th anniversary but that screening was nothing like the one I experienced last night.

The digital projection was flawless with the image sharp and perfect as though we were

Universal Studios

watching a print struck directly from the original camera negative. The sounds, which may have been remastered, was rich and enveloping with the bass notes of Williams’ iconic and unforgettable score presented powerfully. Of course, what made this screening so very different from any other of Jaws was that the movie had been retro-scanned into a 3-D format.

In 2016 I made the trip to Hollywood for some Halloween themed fun at Universal Studios followed by a screening of 1979’s Dawn of the Dead retro-scanned into 3-D. Because that conversion had been so successful in presenting the film in 3-D without savaging the experience I wanted to see if Jaws had a similar result.

Yes, yes it did.

The 3-D conversion, which I understand Spielberg helped supervise, was flawless, giving the film that illusion of depth but without taking away from the masterful filmmaking of Spielberg or cinematographer Bill Butler. The added planes of depth changed the experience for me. Now, I have seen this film countless time. It is a movie I know well and can quote at length, but this version felt new and fresh as I noticed the framing of foreground and background elements in a manner I have never noticed before. Because these elements exist in their own plane of depth that are easier to notice and pay particulate attention to. For example, during Quint’s famous ‘Indianapolis’ monologue this was the first time I really noticed that Hooper is in the frame for the entire speech giving Dreyfus time to listen and subtly react as the horrific tale unfolds. With the laser-sharp projection and a screen that is never too dark due to the polarizing glasses, Jaws in 3-D is an experience not to be missed.