Category Archives: History

No, The NAZIs Were NOT Racist Commies

Sometime ago a friend sent me a link to a YouTube Video expounding on the tired, worn, and erroneous idea that NAZIs were actually leftwing with the conclusion that they were in the end the same as Communists just also racists.

That video was either deliberately or unintentionally deceptive. It pulled quotes from Mein Kompf out of context, relied heavily on ideology from the Ernst Rohm wing of the NAZI party a wing that was murdered out of existence during the Night of Long Knives and the video begged the question by repeatedly citing a book whose entire focus was that NAZIs were of the left.

There has been considerable effort by some on the right to popularize the idea that Fascism is of the left just as from the 1030s through the 1070s, and perhaps beyond, to portray Stalinism as a thing of the right with terms like ‘Red Facism.’ Both camps are desperately trying to disassociate themselves with their own murderous extremes but this is nothing but spin.

If you want an excellent argument why the NAZIs weren’t Socialists here’s a video for you.

 


nbsp;

Share

Silly Foreign Fun: T-34

A few of weeks ago I was watching one of my favorite YouTube shows where visual effects artists watch, react, and critique visual effects from various films and television shows. During that episode that had a couple of sequences from recent Russian films one of which was T-34 a World War II story about a Russian tank crew.

The story takes place in two period, the first during the German invasion of the Soviet Union as the NAZI forces approach Moscow when our lead character Ivushkin is part of a desperate effort to blunt the threat to his county. The second and majority of the film take place four years later when Ivushkin and others escape a POW/Concentration camp, thing seem a little mixed up in the movie but it is not one you’d watch for any form of historical accuracy, with a repaired T-34 tank and half a dozen rounds of ammunition making a desperate drive for freedom.

Sadly, the edition available on Amazon Prime is dubbed and there is no Russian language version for streaming. While the voice actors did what they could I and my sweetie-wife prefer subtitled movies to dubbed ones. She likes listening to the foreign languages and I find that the vocal performances tend to be better.

There are quite a few technical errors in the movie but this is not the sort of story where you want gritty, depressing realism. It is a story of heroism against an evil foe. (Set aside that the Soviet unions murdered millions this is their mythology and everyone is the hero of their own myths.) The use of elaborate visual effects through the tank battle sequences that follow fired rounds in exaggerated slow motions provided a lot of engaging moments.

The film was a smashing success at the Russian box office and it is easy to see why. The stars are engaging, the story never really pauses, and it celebrates a heroism that everyone can imagine. This is a perfect streaming choice of a Saturday matinee.

 

Share

A Thumb in the Eye

Next Friday Trump returns to the rally circuit but in doing so he’s quite deliberately putting his thumb in the eye of the black community and everyone with even a modicum of decency. The date is June the 19th and that date is a holiday celebrated by many African-Americans as the end of hundreds of years of chattel slavery was enforced by Union, read American, General Gordon Granger in Galveston Texas. Perhaps you can ascribe ignorance of the date to our most ignorant president but his staff and closest advisers, particularly Steven Miller, are too well educated to be blind to the symbolism.

Trump multiplies his insult by holding this rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma the site of a horrendous slaughter of black residents at hand and aerial attacks from whites. A massacre that slaughtered hundreds and left 10,000 homeless with their homes burned and their businesses looted. This ethnic cleansing, it was far beyond a riot, was recently captured in popular media with the opening scenes of HBO’s magnificent series Watchmen. Again, perhaps Trump himself is too uneducated to beware of the history, it would be difficult to under-estimate this man mental abilities, but Miller and the rest will know.

Oklahoma is a solidly red state that in the electoral college is beyond Biden’s reach. Here is no political advantage to hosting a rally in the state.

Trump administration, campaign, and argument is one based on racism and there is no policy or appointment that can justify supporting it.

Share

Why Doctor Strangelove is a Better Anti-Nuclear Film Than Fail Safe.

Since the early 1950s fear of nuclear conflict has been a major element of both American culture and popular entertainment. Science fiction films such as The Day the Earth Stood Still or The Space Children were Movies with a message warning of the dangers of nuclear war.

In 1964 two major films from two major film makers directly confronted the issues terrors and apprehensions The American people felt about nuclear Armageddon. The two films were Doctor Strangelove or How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love the Bomb and Fail Safe. The two films took radically different approaches to the subject with Doctor Strangelove being a farcical satire and Fail Safe being a bleak dramatic portrayal of an accidental nuclear exchange. Both films are critically well regarded with Doctor Strangelove having achieved a far greater amount of cultural penetration and relevance to this day. It is my contention that Doctor Strangelove is not only financially and critically a more successful film but a film which achieves its goal of delivering an anti-nuclear war message more effectively than the more serious and somber Fail Safe.

Doctor Strangelove directed by Stanley Kubrick from a screenplay by Stanley Kubrick Terry Southern and Peter George adapted from the novel Red Alertby Peter George started out as a dramatic interpretation of the novel But as Kubrick worked on the adaptation he found himself drawn to the absurdist nature of nuclear war and converted the project into a black satirical comedy.

In Doctor Strangelove American General Jack D. Ripper lost in paranoid delusions and obsessed with communist conspiracy theories launches an unauthorized nuclear attack on the Soviet Union by his bomber command. As the only person possessing the three letter prefix code which allows communications with the bombers Riper believes that once the administration understands that there is no hope of recalling the attack that The President and the Chiefs of Staff will follow up with a full scale nuclear attack annihilating the Soviet Union. Coordinating with the Soviets the Americans learned that the Soviet Union has constructed a doomsday weapon and that any nuclear attack upon the Soviet will trigger the weapon and end all life on earth. American military forces seize the base commanded by general Ripper and successfully obtains the three-letter prefix for recalling the bombers but one bomber due to battle damage does not receive the recall order proceeds to its secondary target and drops its nuclear payload. The film ends with a montage of nuclear explosion to Vera Lynn singing We’ll Meet Again. While the movie ends with the loss of all life on the planet it is at heart a comedy with broad over the top characters and absurdist situations drawn to exaggeration.

Fail Safe directed by Sidney Lumet written by Walter Bernstein and Peter George based on a novel of the same title by Eugene Burdick and Harvey Wheeler never veers into comedy or absurdity. In fact, throughout the movie’s 112-minute runtime I cannot recall a single scene which lighten the mood or had any comedic effect at all. The entire film is a dramatic intense pressure cooker of a story that never allows the audience a moment of easy breathing.

In Fail Safe American military forces are brought to a state of high alert with nuclear bombers dispatched to their fail-safe points due to a destressed and off-course commercial airliner. Co incidentally during the crisis a Soviet electronic warfare attack on the US strategic command called is a malfunction which sends an erroneous attack message to one bomber group at their fail-safe point. Once the bomber flight flies past their failsafe point their orders are such as to ignore all communications from the ground and continue on their attack. The president the Strategic Air Command coordinating with the Soviet Union are unable to recall the bombers and unable to destroy all of the flight with one bomber surviving to carry out its nuclear attack on Moscow. In order to prevent on all out nuclear exchange between the two countries the president offers up New York City to the Soviets ordering one of his own bombers to destroy the city to restore the balance. The film ends with the president asking the Premier of the Soviet Union, “what do we tell the dead?”

Between the two films Fail Safe on its surface looks to be more realistic, more grounded, more credible, but on any sort of closer inspection it’s clear that there are deep logical flaws in the plotting of Fail Safe that destroys its credibility. In Doctor Strangelove the administration is unable to recall the bombers because they do not have the prefix code for the encryption device that is used on all radio communications between Strategic Air Command and the bombers in the air this is an utterly credible and believable plot element.

In Fail Safe there is no encrypted communication system there is the simplistic order that once the bombers have proceeded past their fail safe point and begin their attack mission they are to ignore all communication from the ground as being potentially deceptive fraudulent forged attempts by the enemy to divert them. For purposes of a plot this sets up the dilemma quite nicely the bombers are on their way to attack Moscow and due to their orders, they cannot be recalled but it is a ridiculous and unrealistic set of orders that any military would ever implement.

During the crisis a presidential advisor advocates to committing to a full nuclear attack on the Soviet Union. His reasoning is that the Soviet communists would surrender rather than be destroyed in the hopes that at some later date they could still achieve worldwide communist revolution and domination. Even if we set aside the idea that the enemy would simply surrender rather than annihilate their opponents his advice is at odds with the premise of how the story works. Once the bombers have flown past their fail safe point they ignore all additional orders you come out divert them to new targets you cannot recall them you cannot declare peace and stop the war even if the Soviets in this story surrendered as the advisor is advocating they would still be destroyed because you cannot stop your bombers. The plot requires that the bomber pilot ignore orders to be recalled setting up an absurd command situation that no military in the world would tolerate. Once this logical fallacy is exposed the film devolves into a didactic moralistic speech.

The best stories have messages, they have themes that are important but when the message overpowers the storytelling when the story must be broken in order to serve the message then it is like a stage magician that has revealed how an illusion is performed all the magic evaporates and nothing is left behind. Doctor Strangelove a film which ends with the destruction of all human life on the planet never fails to entertain and place fair with all the rules of its own fictional setting. In the end it is the film that is remembered for its talent it’s comedy and its message.

Share

Streaming Review: The Best Years of Our Lives (1946)

Utilizing a 14 day free trial period of the streaming service The Criterion Channel I have spent a few days watching in segments the Best Picture Oscar winner for 1946 The Best Years of Our Lives a drama about the troubles of three services men reintegrating into civilian life after returning home from combat in Word War II. The film is on the long side, two hours and 15 minutes but that is because it does try to take a deeper dive into each of its three main characters’ lives rather than focused on a single protagonists with two possible side kicks.

Dana Andrews plays Fred Derry, a captain in the Army Air Forces who served as a bombardier aboard B-17s over the European theater. Married is a party girl, Virginia Mayo Fred’s marriage is one the rocks and he is unable to find gainful employment while struggling with what we now diagnose as PTSD.

Frederick March plays Al Stephenson a platoon sergeant who finds that his children are more adult that he remembers and he struggles with alcoholism. Al is supported by his wife, Myrna Loy as he finds deep conflict between his job as a banker and sympathies for returning servicemen.

Harold Russel plays Homer Parrish a young man who while serving in the U.S. Navy was grievously injured and had both of his hands amputated. Harold’s amputations are not the product of special effects but reality since the actors lost both hands in a training accident. Homer finds it nearly impossible to return to his old life has be perceives everyone around him focusing on his injuries and he’s unable to emotionally open up to his fiancé played by Cathy O’Donnell.

The film is filled with secondary characters, Al’s daughter Peggy, player by Theresa Wright, who develops strong feelings for married Fred. I think in the movie Peggy is suppose to be 21 or so but the actress was 28 the film was released so that threw me off a bit. Homer has his friends at a local watering hole and Fred’s parents give a glimpse at the life Fred came from before the Army made him an officer.

William Wyler, one of classic Hollywood’s most talented director and also a war veteran, directs the film. He used smaller constructed sets, less suited to sweeping camera movements to help capture the feeling of finding home smaller and more constrained for the returning men.

I found it fascinating how some concepts had already pierced the public as early as 1946. In this movie people express the idea that the next war will be atomic and over in a day and that perhaps the US should have waged war against Communism instead of Fascism, two concepts that I would have taken longer to develop in the post war environment.

Overall this was a gripping story, slightly hampered by the production code, about the struggles people live with after experiencing the horror of war.

Share

Hypothetical Hong Kong Horror

As I write this protests, serious dedicated, and disruptive protests are going on in Hong Kong and have been for months. Sparked by a proposal, now tabled, that would allow people extradited from Hong Kong to mainland communist China, the protests and demonstrations reflect very real and very justified fears of the Hong Kong citizenry concerning their freedom and their lives as China tightens its grip on the former British colony.

Twenty Thirty (where dos the time go?) years ago this year another similar series of demonstrations were launch in mainland China itself as protesters took over and occupied Tiananmen Square for more than a month. That protest ended with the Chinese army moving in and what outside of Chinese political influence is referred to as the Tiananmen Square Massacre. The death toll from the communist government’s crackdown range from China’s official tally of 300 to as many as three thousand.

There are many who fear a repeat of the brutal suppression demonstrated by the government of China. I have heard a number of specialists in Chinese matters speculating that such a crackdown is unlikely because the authorities in China were deeply embarrassed by the swift international condemnation over the brutality. I respect the knowledge and experience of these experts, but I also fear that all systems have their breaking point and I find it hard to believe that either side of this crisis in Hong Kong is likely to capitulate to the other. For the people of Hong Kong I desperately hope for their freedom and their safety.

If there is bloody violent repression in Hong Kong I have no confidence that this will be handled well by our current administration in Washington D.C.

I expect that parts of the professional diplomatic corps and governmental apparatus will condemn any slaughter, repression, or brutality on the part of the Chinese authorities, but I also suspect that at best Trump himself will make excuses for the China’s heavy handiness throwing blame and aspersions on the protesters. It has been his nature for many years to admire the ‘strong man’ and brutal governments of the world, referring even to the Tiananmen Square slaughter as an act of strength. His sympathies will be with the dictators of China’s brutal government.

Elected Republican officials may mouth words of displeasure at Trump’s stance, but I doubt that any substantive act will appear in any meaningful manner. The Democratic controlled House will pass legislation, but it will wither in the Senate. Unwilling to cross Trump and his very popular base the GOP officials will make noise and nothing more.

If such a crackdown occurs and should the Senate be in session busy with an impeachment trial the US media will likely giver the carnage short coverage, something may actually induce China to act.

I fear for Hong Kong, a city I have visited, and if I were a praying person, I would pray for them.

Share

Movie Review: The Current War

Completed in 2017 and released only just now due to the break up of the Weinstein Company The Current War  is the story of Thomas Edison and George Westinghouse as they battled to set the standards for electric power and distribution in the United States and the wider world.

Benedict Cumber batch plays Thomas Edison, the proponent of Direct Current (DC) power. DC flows in a single direction and is simple, and at the time was the only current that could be used to drive motors and industrialization Industrialist George Westinghouse, played by Michael Shannon in a role where he not an over bearing villain, supports Alternating Current (AC), where the direction of election flow reverses many times per second. AC power could be produced much cheaper and with clever manipulation transmitted over vastly greater distances that DC which dissipates into nothing after barely more than a mile, but when Westinghouse is advocating for his system there were no motors that could run using the AC standard. Each man is presented favorably with neither placed into the role of ‘villain.’ Benedict’s Edison is a family man, devoted to his wife and children, and a person who refuse to use his genius, name, or vast intellectual resources to create engine of war and destruction; he consider the killing of humans abhorrent. Shannon’s Westinghouse is also a man devoted to his wife, treats her as partner in his enterprise, and also sees himself serving a public good. Edison is supported by his aide and confidant Samuel Insull (Tom Holland) while Westinghouse’s mirror support character is Franklin Pope (Stanley Townsend) the engineer that Westinghouse has charged with inventing an AC motor.

Into the violate conflict of towering intellects and ego arrives a Serbian immigrant, Nikola Tesla (Nicholas Hoult.) Titles identified Edison as an ‘Inventor’ and Westinghouse as an ‘Industrialist’ but Tesla is labeled ‘Futurist,’ a word that would not be applied to technology until the 1920s. Tesla, always more concerned with what is possible than what is personally profitable, a visionary man with unprecedented gifts for engineering and technology claims to have solved the AC motor design.

The war to determine the electric standard is fought city by city, as some adopt Edison’s vision and other Westinghouse’s and the most vicious fighting take place on the front pages of the newspapers as propaganda replaces reason.

The film is generally well made, the scenes are tight, the performances stellar and yet the over all effect is only adequate.  Key moments in the historical record are omitted, such as Tesla surrendering his patents for the AC motor, ensuring that AC becomes the standard but costing himself an uncountable fortune, and set ups in the film are never paid off. The most frustrating of these is centered on the AC motor. Pope has a sewing machine connected to his AC motor and the needles does not move, Westinghouse implores that Pope must solves the problem and move the needle, but yet when the AC motor is invented there is no scene of the sewing machine in action. This is the sort of visual pay off moment that not only provided the audience with critical and visual understanding of the engineering but also can be used as an emotional beat for the characters. Not having such a moment dramatically undercuts the entire arc of the war.

Despite this The Current War  is worth seeing, it is competent film with an amazing cast.

Share

Streaming Review: The Unknown Soldier

Over the past two nights, my sweetie-wife and me watched the Finnish film The Unknown Soldier  a three-hour epic that follows the operations of a machine gun company from the start to the end to The Continuation War. That was, started in 1941 with Finland invading the Soviet Union in hope of regaining territory lost in 1939’s Winter War when the Soviets invaded Finland. Allied with Nazi Germany the Fins expected a collapse of the communist state and for a ‘greater Finland’ to emerge; history of course tells us that did not come to pass.

The film boasts a large cast of characters as we meet the machine gun company just as they have finished their training and the invasion of the USSR has commenced. Released in 2017 The Unknown Soldier  does not glorify warfare but presents it in a stark unforgiving manner in which death is sudden, violent, and often unexpected. While the characters are devoted to their nation, filled with pride and patriotism, the script never devolves into jingoism and hero worship and instead focuses on the day-to-day reality of warfare in a small unit. Early victories buoy the characters’ moods but do not last as the invasion at first falters, stagnates, and eventually collapses into retreat and route. On the directorial front I particularly liked that Aku Louhimies maintained a line of direction for the invasion itself with motion from left to right indicating Eastward and into the Soviet Union and right to left indicating westward and retreat; fast shots of the company marching quickly established the current state of the war. The filmmakers avoided easy clichés for the characters and kept them complex with something difficult and contradictory motivations; they never ceased to be people  first and soldiers second.

The Unknown Soldier is currently available for rent as a streamed film on Amazon.

Share

Foreign Movie Review: Salyut-7

Inspired by the Soviet Mission to save their crippled space station the film Salyut 7is a fictionalized drama in low Earth orbit.

Vladimir Fyodorov is a Soviet Cosmonaut grounded after reporting having seen ‘angels’ in orbit during a life-threatening emergency. His wife and daughter are relieved that Vladimir will no longer be risking his life in dangerous space missions. Everything is upturned when the space station Salyut 7 that was un-crewed and flying on automatic suddenly loses all power and is rendered dead in orbit. Fearful that either the Americans may steal the station by way of a shuttle mission or that the station in an uncontrolled re-entry posses a hazard the Soviet’s decide to launch a mission to repair the station. After all other cosmonauts fail to dock with tumbling station in simulation it is decided to reactive Vladimir and along with an engineer is sent to Salyut 7. Once there they face numerous challenges both technical and personal as they struggle to rescue the station, Soviet prestige, and their very lives in a desperate bid to save the station.

With only a few technical errors, Salyut 7 is a gorgeous film utilizing the very best special effects to recreate the sensation of flying 200 miles above the Earth at 17,000 miles per hour.  In the interests of narrative and drama, the story deviates significantly from the historical record and should be best viewed as a work of fiction rather than a view of actual events. The acting is very good, the drama is tight and the characters believable and relatable. Currently available on Amazon Prime in Russian with English subtitles Salyut 7 is worth the time for anyone who enjoys a heavy dose of technical realism in their space films/

 

Share

Are they Alternative Histories?

The following post has spoilers for Inglorious Basterds and Once Upon a Time in Hollywood so proceed at your own discretion.

 

In the film Inglorious Basterds the heroes in a bloody and suicidal action murder the inner circle of the Nazi party including Hitler himself, presumably bring World War II to a premature close while in the current movie Once Upon a Time in Hollywood the cult followers of Charles Manson instead of murdering Sharon Tate and her houseguests attack her neighbors presumably launching Hollywood into a utterly novel sociological path.

Are these films with their fantastic premises and fairy tale ending popular examples of Alternative History fiction? Alternative History is that genre of speculative fiction which imagines how the world might have been different had history taken a different track than the one we know. For example what if the USA had lost its war of independence, or if WWI had not started? Harry Turtledove is today’s best practitioner of this art.

One the face of it this answer seems obvious, both of Tarantino’s film wildly diverge from actual history making those cinematic excursions truly an alternative to our own. However I think it require more than that. After Braveheart has loads of things wildly different from actual history and yet I have not heard anyone argue that it is an ‘alternative history.’

I believe an essential component of alternative history is an examination of what those differences mean to our understanding of the world. It is an examination of the consequencesof the change not just the change itself. In both films the story ends with the change, we never see what that means for the wider world. How does Hitler dying in 1944 change the Cold War, with Tate’s brutal murder how does film making change? We have no answer from the filmmaker, not even the hint of one. These are fairy tales, not alternative histories.

Share