.

I had originally planned to watch and comment on Cronos (1992) the first feature film from Guillermo del Toro, and I may still but when I attempted to watch it, I grew quite tired and far too exhausted for a foreign language film. Instead, I will contrast and compare the two versions of Dawn of the Dead the original from 1979 and the remake from 2004.

Both film deal with the world crashing into chaos with the now cliche ‘Zombie Apocalypse.’ The ’79 is a continuation of the plague that began with Night of the Living Dead while the ’04 goes from initial outbreak to societal collapse in the film’s opening minutes.

Laurel Group

Written and Directed by George A. Romero, the ’79 is at its heart a social satire and commentary on consumerism. The four principal characters are all people who have abandoned their greater duties to society for their own self-preservation and when flung by the zombie hordes into the outskirts of suburbia take refuge in an abandoned indoor mall.

Universal Pictures

Written by Guardians of the Galaxy fame James Gunn and directed by Zack Snyder the ’04 remake eschews the social commentary and satire for frenetic speed and a tale of pure survival. The characters, a much larger and more diverse collection, are simply the random survivors that have happened to have congregated at the shopping mall without the location providing any addition observation on humanity. The film has a few nods to the original that it drew its inspiration from, visual effects allowed Snyder to bring in the ‘copter that the original character fled with and Ken Foree from the ’70 makes a cameo appearance and restates one of his character’s lines from that groundbreaking film.

The ’79 while bleak in it ending presented the audience with at least the possibility that some of the characters may have found a sanctuary thew ’04 with its end-credit sequence eliminates any such ‘happy ending.’

I watched both films on their original release, the ’79 at a local drive-in theater and the ’04 at a mall’s multiplex. Both films grace my physical media collection but without a doubt it is the ’79 that is more often pulled from the shelves in played.

Gunn’s script is perfectly serviceable but lacks not only deeper meaning or theme but also Gunn’s eclectic and entertaining humor. Snyder’s direction is faster and better suited to modern audiences but lack the sly irony that Romero snuck into most of his movies.