Monthly Archives: April 2020

Other People’s Shoes

Many years ago, I had a roommate who was into geeky things this same way I am. One day, because odd questions are always coming to me such is the mind of a writer, I asked him if he had the chance for 24 hours to have his mind transferred into a woman’s body would he do it?

His answer was a resounding, explicit, and definite NO.

This surprised and shocked me. Given that the question is a fantasy, mind transference is an impossibility not a science-fiction that is possible, I would leap at the chance to, quite literally,  live, briefly, in someone else’s shoes.

I asked this question of several other male friends. (At the time there we no regular women as friends or otherwise in my life. I was working nights at a lab and had zero social life and my circle of even acquaintances had grown quite small.) All them reacted pretty much the same way, not even for a day would they live as another gender.

I think there are two principal drive factors in why they all refused to entertain even in speculation a willingness of cross that boundary.

First is our culture’s pervasive homophobia. The mere thought of having to experience even a slight sexual attraction, without acting upon it in any way, towards men must have seemed frightening.

Second is a recognition, even they were not consciously aware of it, how poorly treated women are in our society.

The idea of living briefly as another gender or race is a question that I ponder from time to time. Myself, I am insatiably curious and I always am wondering what life is like from another perspective. I find it difficult to envision a mindset that rejects that speculation.

 

Share

Streaming Review: The Grifters

I remember wanting to see the neo-noir back in 1991 when it played at a local art house theater. Somehow, I never made it to the theater and missed the movie entirely.

The Grifters, adapted from the novel of the same name, stars John Cusack, Anjelica Huston, and Annette Bening as con artists, i.e. grifters, Roy, Lilly, and Myra respectively . Roy is Lilly’s son but because she was so young when he was born he was passed off as her younger brother for most of his life. Lilly works for a major Maryland mobster, Bobo, traveling to racetracks and placing large bets to reduce the odds for longshot horses and is estranged from Roy. Roy is a short con artist, playing trick on marks that pay off quickly with elaborate set-up allowing him to avoid most form of legal entrapment and enforcement. Myra is a long con artist looking for a new partner and is involved with Roy though at the start of the story neither are aware that they are both grifters. Grievously injured by a mark, Roy lands in the hospital bringing all three of the character together and dynamic of the triangle are established. Lilly wants her son out of the racket and to go ‘straight,’ Myra wants to displace Lilly as a major influence in Roy’s life, and Roy struggles to find a way to satisfy both women while maintaining his independence. Stakes quickly rise and soon it becomes a matter of life and death over Roy’s stash of cash and his relationship with Lilly.

Directed by Stephen Frears and produced by Martin Scorsese The Grifters is a bleak, cynical look at humanity and the self-destructive nature of greed and the need to dominate. I enjoyed the film thought I found the ending less than fully satisfying. While the story and plot are both resolved I tend to prefer for a story to force a character to make a choice, a hard, difficult choice, rather than having an impulsive action produce unintended consequences that resolve the conflicts. This is not the same as a deus ex machina where an unestablished power or character magically removes the troubles but rather in this case a realistic and predictable outcome comes from a moment’s anger rather than a character making the decision to produce that final outcome.

Still, I am glad I watched the film before it finished its run on The Criterion Channel at the end of the month.

 

 

Share

A Prolog and Chapter One Are Not Interchangeable

I’ve started reading a new novel, no I am not going to name the book because as this is not a review site I only name titles when I love the work, and I am concerned about how the whole thing has started.

This novel opened with Chapter One and spent about 12,000 words on a set of characters that I realize we are unlikely to ever see again. The event of those pages clearly was important to the plot that unfolds in the rest of the story and set up many crucial details that I can see the author intends to use through the adventure. However, since none of our principal characters are around in these scenes this feel terribly like a prolog to me and not the opening chapter of a story.

I may have spent 12,000 words getting to know characters, understanding their emotional lives, and concerned about the troubles they face, but now all that emotional investment feels wasted.

This is related to the troubles with stories that end with ‘it was all a dream’ an its variations or sequels that undo all the emotional stakes from previous installments. (I’m looking at your Alien 3.)

Ideally when people engage with your fiction, by reading, listening, or viewing, they should become emotionally invested in the characters and the outcomes of their struggles. The resolution of the story and the plot and the return on that investment with catharsis or pathos being the final reward. When it ends as a dream then it’s like that check bounced and we’re left with nothing for the emotional currency we’ve spent. The check has bounced. In the case of Alien 3 after we’ve come to really care about Newt and Hicks in Aliens and desperately wanting for Ripley to save them both the sequel comes along and repossesses out victory making us into suckers for caring.

This novel has pulled me into these characters lives and now has waved a hand and said, ‘Don’t think about them anymore. Here’s new people to get emotional about.’ But I’m now burned and I am more likely to keep my emotional distance wary of the author is going to again steal characters away. Had this been labeled a prolog I would have been emotionally ready to learn things but not become attached. The poor doomed rangers at the start of A Song of Fire and Iceare not our main characters and telling us that it is a prolog allowed us as the readers to learn the vital information their story needed to tell us without playing us for suckers.

Share

Why Doctor Strangelove is a Better Anti-Nuclear Film Than Fail Safe.

Since the early 1950s fear of nuclear conflict has been a major element of both American culture and popular entertainment. Science fiction films such as The Day the Earth Stood Still or The Space Children were Movies with a message warning of the dangers of nuclear war.

In 1964 two major films from two major film makers directly confronted the issues terrors and apprehensions The American people felt about nuclear Armageddon. The two films were Doctor Strangelove or How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love the Bomb and Fail Safe. The two films took radically different approaches to the subject with Doctor Strangelove being a farcical satire and Fail Safe being a bleak dramatic portrayal of an accidental nuclear exchange. Both films are critically well regarded with Doctor Strangelove having achieved a far greater amount of cultural penetration and relevance to this day. It is my contention that Doctor Strangelove is not only financially and critically a more successful film but a film which achieves its goal of delivering an anti-nuclear war message more effectively than the more serious and somber Fail Safe.

Doctor Strangelove directed by Stanley Kubrick from a screenplay by Stanley Kubrick Terry Southern and Peter George adapted from the novel Red Alertby Peter George started out as a dramatic interpretation of the novel But as Kubrick worked on the adaptation he found himself drawn to the absurdist nature of nuclear war and converted the project into a black satirical comedy.

In Doctor Strangelove American General Jack D. Ripper lost in paranoid delusions and obsessed with communist conspiracy theories launches an unauthorized nuclear attack on the Soviet Union by his bomber command. As the only person possessing the three letter prefix code which allows communications with the bombers Riper believes that once the administration understands that there is no hope of recalling the attack that The President and the Chiefs of Staff will follow up with a full scale nuclear attack annihilating the Soviet Union. Coordinating with the Soviets the Americans learned that the Soviet Union has constructed a doomsday weapon and that any nuclear attack upon the Soviet will trigger the weapon and end all life on earth. American military forces seize the base commanded by general Ripper and successfully obtains the three-letter prefix for recalling the bombers but one bomber due to battle damage does not receive the recall order proceeds to its secondary target and drops its nuclear payload. The film ends with a montage of nuclear explosion to Vera Lynn singing We’ll Meet Again. While the movie ends with the loss of all life on the planet it is at heart a comedy with broad over the top characters and absurdist situations drawn to exaggeration.

Fail Safe directed by Sidney Lumet written by Walter Bernstein and Peter George based on a novel of the same title by Eugene Burdick and Harvey Wheeler never veers into comedy or absurdity. In fact, throughout the movie’s 112-minute runtime I cannot recall a single scene which lighten the mood or had any comedic effect at all. The entire film is a dramatic intense pressure cooker of a story that never allows the audience a moment of easy breathing.

In Fail Safe American military forces are brought to a state of high alert with nuclear bombers dispatched to their fail-safe points due to a destressed and off-course commercial airliner. Co incidentally during the crisis a Soviet electronic warfare attack on the US strategic command called is a malfunction which sends an erroneous attack message to one bomber group at their fail-safe point. Once the bomber flight flies past their failsafe point their orders are such as to ignore all communications from the ground and continue on their attack. The president the Strategic Air Command coordinating with the Soviet Union are unable to recall the bombers and unable to destroy all of the flight with one bomber surviving to carry out its nuclear attack on Moscow. In order to prevent on all out nuclear exchange between the two countries the president offers up New York City to the Soviets ordering one of his own bombers to destroy the city to restore the balance. The film ends with the president asking the Premier of the Soviet Union, “what do we tell the dead?”

Between the two films Fail Safe on its surface looks to be more realistic, more grounded, more credible, but on any sort of closer inspection it’s clear that there are deep logical flaws in the plotting of Fail Safe that destroys its credibility. In Doctor Strangelove the administration is unable to recall the bombers because they do not have the prefix code for the encryption device that is used on all radio communications between Strategic Air Command and the bombers in the air this is an utterly credible and believable plot element.

In Fail Safe there is no encrypted communication system there is the simplistic order that once the bombers have proceeded past their fail safe point and begin their attack mission they are to ignore all communication from the ground as being potentially deceptive fraudulent forged attempts by the enemy to divert them. For purposes of a plot this sets up the dilemma quite nicely the bombers are on their way to attack Moscow and due to their orders, they cannot be recalled but it is a ridiculous and unrealistic set of orders that any military would ever implement.

During the crisis a presidential advisor advocates to committing to a full nuclear attack on the Soviet Union. His reasoning is that the Soviet communists would surrender rather than be destroyed in the hopes that at some later date they could still achieve worldwide communist revolution and domination. Even if we set aside the idea that the enemy would simply surrender rather than annihilate their opponents his advice is at odds with the premise of how the story works. Once the bombers have flown past their fail safe point they ignore all additional orders you come out divert them to new targets you cannot recall them you cannot declare peace and stop the war even if the Soviets in this story surrendered as the advisor is advocating they would still be destroyed because you cannot stop your bombers. The plot requires that the bomber pilot ignore orders to be recalled setting up an absurd command situation that no military in the world would tolerate. Once this logical fallacy is exposed the film devolves into a didactic moralistic speech.

The best stories have messages, they have themes that are important but when the message overpowers the storytelling when the story must be broken in order to serve the message then it is like a stage magician that has revealed how an illusion is performed all the magic evaporates and nothing is left behind. Doctor Strangelove a film which ends with the destruction of all human life on the planet never fails to entertain and place fair with all the rules of its own fictional setting. In the end it is the film that is remembered for its talent it’s comedy and its message.

Share

The First Negative Review Has Arrived

Wednesday evening just before I slipped off to bed, I got a Google alert of a new review of Vulcan’s Forge. Yes, I have an alert set up over at Google to keep me informed of when people post things about my debut novel. The review came from a person in the United Kingdom which makes sense as the publisher is a UK entity.

It was my first unqualified negative review.

I say ‘negative’ and not ‘bad’ because I do not want there to be the slightest suggestion that I imply that the review itself is poor. As I have said often in my writers group meetings no honest critique or review can be wrong. It is how that person reacted to that piece on that day. It is the underlying assumption upon which is build the critique phrase ‘Your mileage may vary.’ What is wonderful for one person is terrible to another.

How did I react to my first truly ‘I did not like this book’ review?

Shrug.

It is part of the gig. Now, I am not suggesting that anyone else is wrong is they feeling more strongly when that get a negative review. Authors are people and people differ wildly but for me I can accept that someone really did not like by work and not feel any real emotional distress. If fact I read the review and then went off to bed and slept quite well.

If it didn’t matter to me then why did I read the review? why seek them out?

Well, taking criticism is a skill and it requires practice. It’s good to get hit and learnt that you do survive it.

I’m also curious. It is fascinating to see the wildly different interpretations people have about the work. This applies to positive reviews as well as negative ones. Everyone bring their own lenses to their reading and so the exact same text will never be interpreted the same way by any two people. I love seeing the various internal codebooks through which this is deciphered. (Of course, I bring my own to the reading of these reviews and not matter how diligently I try I can never fully escape them, but still I do try.)

Perhaps for other it is very good advice to never read reviews but for me it is a fascinating glimpse into the inner working of another person’s mind.

Share

Accessible Science Fiction

From Hugo Gernsback in the mid 1920s to today modern science-fiction has grown encompassing a number of fields, styles, and literary approaches that in some case are rather inaccessible to readers who are not extensively read in the genre. This is not necessarily a bad thing. The field, any field, grows at the bleeding vanguard edges not in the safety and comfort of what has been well established and explored. Stories that challenge notions about reality itself and what it means to be human are exciting frontiers for SF and we need them to expand our horizons.

Science Fiction also needs new blood, new readers and we can rarely entice them into the genre if the only selection available require a deep experience in the field. There must also be science-fiction stories that are inviting to new readers. Stories that people without experience in the genre can relate to and enjoy.

One of the persons who read my novel Vulcan’s Forge wrote me to share that she rarely reads SF. It is not her genre but she thoroughly enjoyed by book and found it difficult to put down. As an author that of course is very pleasing to hear but it has also made me realize that I want to write accessible science-fiction. I know my limitations both in imagination and in literary devices means I would do poorly trying to be the vanguard of the genre. There are many authors I admire and enjoy who are so much better at it that myself that I can leave that area of the genre to them. I’d be happy to be the sort of writer that can invite and introduce new people to this style of literature that I adore.

Share

Not in Gear

My brain is not in gear this morning. Not burning essays or posts to give to you so I am going to share a photo I took. My skills as a photographer are not great but it’s a pastime I enjoy.

This is a serval cat and I’m rather proud of how this shot came out.

Share

Quick Hit

Automobile emergencies have stolen some of my morning posting time away from me so today’s posting will be brief.

I have decided as an experiment and practice to do something I have not done in quite a while, write a screenplay.

I used to primarily think of myself as a screenplay writer. Films are a passion of mine and if you have read Vulcan’s Forge you can see that passion represented in the plotting of the novel. While I haven’t sold a screenplay, I have written and co-written a few and I find the form to fun to work with. For the last several months I have been listening to the podcast Scriptnotes and I am exciting to incorporate some of the things I have learned about screen writing.

So, this week I started a screenplay with no intention of selling it. To keep from spinning wheels, I decided that the best form of this experiment is to adapt my novel Vulcan’s Forge. It should be fun.

Share

Sunday Night Movie: Back to the Future

1985 was a very different time and the middle of a decade of film that reverberates to this day. So many geek favorite films and franchises were completed, started, or concluded during the 80s and one of the most beloved and important was Back to the Future, the third collaboration between Steven Spielberg, already a powerhouse of genre cinema, and Robert Zemeckis. Friends for year previously their earlier two joint projects, Used Cars directed by Zemeckis and starring Kurt Russell and 1941 co-written by Zemeckis but directed by Spielberg, had performed poorly at the box office leading Zemeckis to fear that another failure would endanger their friendship. Back to the Future dominated the summer’s box office propelling Zemeckis’ career to new heights and launching a trilogy of films with groundbreaking special effects.

Marty McFly (Michael J Fox) is a teenager struggling with his own self-doubts and a family whose prospects are dim. His mother Loraine (Lea Thompson) is lost in an alcoholic fog, his father George (Crispin Glover) is bullied by a co-worker and unable to assert himself, and Marty fears failure so much he is unwilling to really try. Marty’s strange but touching friendship with the town’s eccentric inventor Doc Brown (Christopher Lloyd) leads him to be involved with Brown’s time machine invention and eventually trapped back in the hazy and distant past of 1955 where Marty inadvertently disrupts historical events threatening his own existence.

Budgeted at 19 million dollars and becoming the most successful film of 1985 with a box office take of 381 million Back to the Future was a monster of a movie. In addition to Zemeckis the film helped, along with another summer movie Teen Wolf, make a star out of Michael J Fox and favored a powerful symphonic score by Alan Silvestri over the decade’s trend of using pop songs in a music video style, usually in montages. While the movie had a few popular songs and they featured heavily on the soundtrack album the film itself leaned heavily in a more traditional manner on underscoring and the symphonic sound that had returned in the 70s with prominence of John Williams’ work on Jaws and Star Wars.

While Back to the Future is a prime example of an 80s whimsical movie, heavy on fun and never in danger of taking itself too seriously with a heavy political message it is no without its own darker undertones. When we meet Loraine in 1985 she’s a woman that seems withdrawn and fearful of life a fear she is passing down to her children, but Loraine of 1955 is outgoing, confident, and unafraid of life. There is no doubt that Lorain of 1985 is a survivor of untreated trauma and while that exact nature of that trauma is never directly revealed the unsettling and threatening relationship between Loraine and George’s bully Biff, played brilliantly by Thomas F Wilson who would steal scenes with his range in the next two sequels, hints that an unspoken sexual assault hides in the unexplored familial history.

Back to the Future is a movie that plays as well in 2020 as it did in 1985 and well worth any re-watching during these dark and frightening times.

Share

The Weird Ways I Dream

With the recent passing of actor Brian Dennehy, I got to thinking about the weird way I sometimes dream. Don’t worry those two disparate concepts do eventually tie together.

People when they are asleep dream in sorts of manners. My sister has told me that her dreams are in black and white and only in two dimensions like something from an old television show. Personally, I dream in full color three-dimensional glory in absolute fidelity. In fact, when I awaken from a dream there may be several moments when I have to sort out what is reality and what was dream. We’re not talking delusional things like nightmarish monster and the like but if I dreamt of eating an apple then I will wake up with the taste still lingering in my mouth and I have to take note that I was not actually having one. But full realism is not where I find that my dreams are the oddest.

Sometimes I dream movies.

I don’t mean that I dream about movies, though that has happened but rather my dreams become films. Occasionally I will be in one of the film dreams as a character but there have also been instances where I never appear in the story at all and I’m observing it like any other movie.

Dennehy appeared in one of my nightmares. This is one of those movie dreams where I watched and did not find myself inside of it as a doomed character. Dennehy, Anthony Perkins (of Psycho, though he had already passed when I had this nightmare) and a woman whom I did not recognize take a small boat into icy waters to retrieve cannisters of toxic waste that they had illegally dumped. They have to move the barrels before authorities discover the crime. The woman really really hates Dennehy’s character but the backstory reasons are never revealed. Diving for the waste they are attacked by eel-like monsters. Perkins is killed and the two survivors end up stranded on a rock jutting from the sea trapped by the eel/monsters.

I used the nightmare as inspiration for a short story “Araceli” that appeared in my collection Horseshoes and Hand Grenades: Tales of Technology and Terror. I have always felt that nightmares are gifts for my creativity.

 

Share