The Illustrative Example of Dave Chappelle

.

Comedians are often getting into metaphorical hot water as the nature of comedy, good comedy that is, is to push the boundaries of taste, hopefully exploring unspoken or unconsidered truths, while bringing laughter to their audiences. Of course, if you are flying your craft at the edge of the envelope, then occasionally you’ll end up on the bad side of the curve and lose control. Then it is a question whether you can recover or if you crash and burn.

I cannot say that I am overly familiar with the stand-up work of Dave Chappelle. I have caught a couple jokes and set ups back in the day when one surfed channels instead of websites, but never found his material so compelling as to stop my thumb from pressing the button and moving on. I know Chappelle’s work best as the on-screen sidekick to Tom Hanks in the rom-com You’ve Got Mail. Chappelle has a couple of times now broken out of the comedy section of popular media and into the political discourse having angered some faction and drawn their verbal fire for material that they considered “over the line”, most recently from the right for his observation that murdered conservative commentator Charlie Kirk’s afterlife is one in Hell. It has been reported that Chappelle said that since Charlie Kirk’s murder he has “feels better.” Well, no one is compelled to feel bad for any person’s murder. Charitable thoughts are not an obligation. If that is the sum total of Chappelle’s jab at Charlie Kirk, well, in my opinion that is unimaginative, pedestrian, and frankly hardly worth a moment’s consideration, but Charlie Kirk is a venerated martyr of the right, and any disparagement is met with fury and indignation. But that reaction is far from righteous.

Chappelle, however, is a perfect illustration of why any moral outrage from the right can be safely and utterly ignored as their sensitivities are attuned only to their own, with no consideration for anyone beyond their own tribe, and why their indignation is merely another tool, another weapon, in their arsenal to dominate and claim a victorious victimhood.

Just a few years ago Chappelle was once again drawing verbal fire for the insensitivity of his material. When that firestorm erupted around his work, conservatives defended the comedian, proclaiming that comedy must be allowed to be transgressive, to push the boundaries of good taste, and that those who complained with overly sensitive snowflakes unable to take a joke. At that time it was material that used the trans community as Chappelle’s punching bag, not conservative blowhards, and the political left found nothing funny in those routines. It is even reported that Charlie Kirk defended Chappelle’s trans-oriented humor, but of course such defenses cannot extend to humor when it is turned against conservatives. Insensitivities are only allowed when they are aimed at the proper targets.

The right’s defense of Chappelle’s routine had nothing to do with the transgressive nature of comedy and everything to do with seeing a community of which they did not approve of come under some sort of attack. Now that Chappelle is making jokes at the expense of one of theirs, suddenly taste and decorum are the law of the land.

This hypocrisy of the right is not confined to the stand-up’s stage but is playing out as we speak in the electoral fallout of the 2026 midterm elections. Amy Acton, the governor-elect of Ohio, has refused to take the concession call from the Republican she defeated in that contest, Vivek Ramaswamy, sending it directly to voicemail, an action that has drawn more “indignation” from the right for its “disrespectful” nature. But this is just another example from the seemingly endless list of Republican hypocrisies. In a last-minute and desperate act to try and save a campaign that was already failing, Ramaswamy seized on Acton’s mother, who was elderly and, by reports, living in her car, using this woman to cut an ad attacking Acton as a liar. Acton’s mother, according to documentation and reports from the time, fled with the man who sexually assaulted Acton when she was just twelve, choosing him over her daughter. In my opinion, Acton is rightly justified in refusing to speak with Ramaswamy and the Republican “outrage” is just the asymmetrical yardstick that they want to play by. They, the GOP, want to be as mean, as cruel as they wish, as untruthful as they wish, making vile lies about entire communities, while demanding that they be treated with a courtesy and respect that they show to no one but their own.

I do believe that it is pointless to confront conservatives with their hypocrisy. They do not care and will never acknowledge it or change their nature. Revealing their nature is useful only in affecting those who might be swayed by it, those people who are ignorant of the right’s tactics, and not in any manner those who engage in it.

Chappelle is a perfect example of this: he is their hero when he makes their “enemies” the butt of his jokes, and he is a devil when he turns that same fire on their own. Conservative “outrage” is not anything worthy of thought or consideration except as a weapon that they wield in pursuit of power.

Share

The Overtime Temptation Has Returned and a pair of Film Reviews

.

I suspect that posting will be spotty here for the rest of the year because the offer of overtime at the day job has begun, and with this season looking to be more intensive than previous years, I expect that there will continue to be a demand for overtime. The lure of all that extra cash is terribly hard to resist. So, let me try to knock out two film reviews in one post in case tomorrow I need to rise at 5:30 am for those extra hours and extra cash.

Wicker

Black Bear Pictures

With a script, adapted from a short story by Ursula Wills-Jones, writer/directors Alex Huston Fischer and Eleanor Wilson bring to life a fable of a lonely, outcast woman who has a husband crafted for her out of wicker and the disruption that brings to an isolated little village.

Because both the short story and film present this story in the style of a fable, it is not one that should be approached with a mind to rigorously examine the “world building” of this fantasy setting. This is not a J.R.R. Tolkien second world fantasy with a deep lore and expansive languages; it is a “once upon a time” fairytale meant to comment on our world by way of a wholly imagined and unreal setting. None of these characters even have names, only titles, and the women, save for the protagonist, the Fisherwoman, are all titled either as X’s Daughter, or X’s Wife, making it very, very plain upon which aspect of reality this fable is examining.

Olivia Colman, as the protagonist, the Fisherwoman, is characteristically wonderful, bringing to the screen with talent the years of abuse that she has endured at the hands of the small-minded village. Alexander Skarsgård, once again not playing something human but with deep humanity, matches her beat for beat as the Wicker Husband. Peter Dinklage and Elizabeth Debicki round out the core cast.

Wicker is a small film, not a several-hundred-million-dollar blockbuster, but it is entertaining, darkly funny, sharp in its voice, and profound in what it has to offer in commentary. It is well worth seeing.

Wild Horse Nine

Searchlight Pictures

This dark comedy from Martin McDonagh is a period piece centered on a pair of CIA agents, Chris (John Malkovich) and Lee (Sam Rockwell), who take a week away from orchestrating the coup to overthrow the democratically elected Marxist government of Chile for a holiday on Easter Island. Lee has been ordered to keep a close eye on Chris who, as he struggles with a terminal illness, has both become erratic, prone to spilling secrets that the Agency prefers be kept secret, and is writing a memoir of his life, yet another threat to the Agency’s security. Lee, in addition to watching his friend slip away, also has to deal by telephone with his disintegrating marriage with Marge (Parker Posey).

Wild Horse Nine is not so much about the secrets the government keeps or the conspiracies the script uses to illustrate them, as much as it is about truth and the most important truths of all, the ones we keep with our loved ones. When a liberal Chilean college student advises Chris to stop telling lies, he does, discovering a freedom and a revelation that had eluded him.

If you have seen other Martin McDonagh films, particularly In Bruges, then you will have a very close idea of the tone of Wild Horse Nine. While there is violence and blood on the screen of the film, it is not about the violence we do with guns and bombs. It is about the violence we do when we slaughter the truth. This has been described as a “hangout” movie; it is not so much about the plot as it is about spending time with Lee and Chris and thinking about the questions these two men, who have done monstrous things, raise about what it means to be alive.

Share

Not a Wave, a Rout

.

Pundit Bill Kristol, writing for The Bulwark this morning, argued that the tired and overused metaphor of a ‘wave’ is misleading as it conjures an image of a natural force beyond the control or even influence of mere men and that the election result last night and continuing as the count does today and beyond is the work of people, of humanity. He is right on target with that observation, but it is still good to have an image that captures not only the scope and scale of last night’s results but the feeling of it as well, and I think the most on target metaphor is a rout. What happened last night was more akin to Agincourt or the First Battle of Bull Run than an ocean wave washing away a beach.

As I write this the morning of November 4th, 2026, the Democratic Party has been projected to have won control of 54 seats in the Senate with two elections too close for a victor to be decided, Alaska and Mississippi, so it is possible that the final number may be as high as 56. In the House of Representatives, the Democratic Party is currently holding a majority of 228 with a number of contests yet to be called. The midterm elections of 2026 have been a devastating defeat for the Republican Party, losing some contests that it have not lost since the election of FDR. There are a lot of lessons to be learned by both parties, and I pray that they do learn them.

For the GOP, they must come to terms with the consequences of handing power to a vainglorious buffoon for whom lying comes as often as a breath and for whom theft and betrayal are not character flaws but the defining attributes of his character. They should, if there is any justice in this universe, spend a decade or more in the wilderness. Individuals who have benefited from the corruption and the theft and the betrayal of the public trust need to be held accountable, and the politicians who chose the easy path, the one that kept their heads down and let the monsters do what they did to save their own political lives need to leave public life.

In addition to individual cases of corruption and malfeasance, the Republican Party itself needs to reorient to the future and build something new and earn the trust of the people and the world that it so recklessly squandered. There has been talk of returning to the sane GOP that existed before Trump seized control of the party. Such talk is the wishes of children who are in denial about the nature of reality. Nothing ever goes back to a previous state; time and entropy flow in only one direction. The party of Reagan’s conservatism is as much a matter of history as the Rockefeller Republicans before it or the interwar Isolationists before them. It is time to define what ‘conservative’ means for the 21st century and not try a doomed retreat to what it meant in the previous one.

The Democratic Party needs to recognize that this election is a repudiation of the Republicans and not an embrace of the Democrats. A two-party system can lead one to interpret victories as love for one’s own when that can just as easily be hatred of the opposing party. The victories in Texas and Kansas can be as easily squandered as the Republicans squandered their national victories. The Democratic Party needs to learn how to appeal to voters who are not onboard with the entire national platform and to find a way to do so with without betraying their base or their principles. There is a tremendous opportunity here for the Democratic Party, but only an opportunity, not anything assured.

I am thrilled and overjoyed by the results of this election season. A parade of cabinet-level impeachments would make my 2027 and 2028, but only time will tell what the true outcome of last night will hold. Last night was not a force of nature, a storm front that moved across the nation, or a miracle delivered by some supernatural entity, it was the result of tireless work and literally millions of people making clear their choices. This victory is thiers.

Share

The Curse and Blessing of Imagination

.

On the first day of this month a Learjet 60 crossing Florida on its way to the Bahamas suffered a catastrophic loss of control and plunged in a matter of seconds from over thirty thousand feet directly into the ground, killing all nine people aboard. By the most amazing turn of luck, despite the crash taking place in the city of West Palm Beach, Florida, and on its streets during the day, apparently no one on the ground was killed in the accident. The horrific event was, in part, captured on video from a driver’s dashboard camera with one frame showing a heavily motion-blurred image of the doomed aircraft nose down just above the street where it crashed. That image, the barely discernible outline of the sleek jet frozen in its final moment before impact, haunts my mind.

The seven passengers and two crew of the aircraft occupy my thoughts and my imagination. It is all too easy, so easy in fact that the process spontaneously occurs, for me to envision the terror that they suffered in their final moments alive. The fright as the jet encountered thunderstorm-generated turbulence, the screams as it not just fell but dove from high above Florida, the g-forces that pushed and pulled on them, all this comes easily to my mind and fills my heart with deep, deep sorrow.

There are people, vile, petty, and heartless, who have already seized on the gender of the crew, using this tragedy for their small-minded political purposes. I pity these poor, damaged specimens of humanity that appear to lack the basic empathy to have any consideration for others or anything beyond their own narrow objectives.

I do not know, nor do I pretend to know, what caused this terrible event. That is for the experts to determine, and that process is not a quick or easy endeavor. What I know is how I feel about the people, the family aboard, their friends traveling with them to a sunny beach, the nanny working her job, and the absolute and all-consuming fear that defined the end of their lives. I feel this because my mind, my riotous imagination, refuses to let the pictures of what may have transpired in their doomed cabin leave my thoughts. This happens very often with these very public tragedies and the too-frequent scenes of mass murder that take place in our deeply damaged nation. It is these visualizations that can disrupt my sleep, bringing about sorrow and depression.

But it is not without its blessing.

The same unrequested talent that envisions what it may be like to be caught up in such terrible events is the same process that brings to me characters, settings, and concepts that I explore in fiction. The pain I feel when I think about what reality has visited upon real persons I can transfer to the people who only exist in my mind. When I write about characters in danger of losing their lives, this empathy and ability to put myself so completely in another’s point of view becomes an asset and not just something to endure. This empathic viewpoint extends far beyond just fear and pain: it allows me to walk in the shoes of a woman in love with her man, of a gay man seeing the joy in discovering another who reflects his attraction, and to feel the thrill of skydiving, though that is a hobby I am far from engaging in. The benefits extend far beyond the artistic: when issues of political policy come to the fore, it is far easier to imagine what something might do to lives that are not my own.

I would not trade away that imagination that allows me to create whole worlds and peoples for the poor peace of being soulless and unfeeling in the face of tragedies. Nothing good comes for free, and the price of the best and worst things in life is very rarely in cash; it is in what they do to you as a person.

I desperately hope that something can be learned from this terrible crash in Florida that makes the world a little safer for flight, and I will continue to bear the emotional weight of this cursed and blessed mind.

Share

November is Upon Us

.

November, and in particular this November, is a strange time of change and transition. Spooky season has passed, and for most people the fascination with all things horror has passed as well, leaving the macabre, the grotesque, the gruesome, and the frightening to us true believers. The annual changing of the clocks returns, this time turning the hands back one hour so that the night follows the end of work so much more closely that many of us return to our homes in darkness. How much more fitting for those of who keep the spirit of spooky season year-round.
In the United States this is the end of our prolonged and endurance-testing election season, which more and more is not a season but a nearly endless state of affairs. For our English cousins it is a time of bonfires and fireworks as they celebrate an unsuccessful coup so many centuries past.
For writers, November used to be the time of community, when scribblers of all sorts of talent and competence entered into the contest to compose a novel of at least 50,000 words by the 30th of the month, but sadly controversy has ended that community and no collective has yet replaced it. I tried once, many years ago, to participate, but that grueling pace was one I could not sustain.
For me personally, November is a time when the workload at my day job begins to expand exponentially. My division deals with members enrolling onto our Medicare Advantage plan. During most of the year the work is steady and sometimes even quite slow, but each year the enrollments for the following calendar year begin to arrive in a tsunami of work. Overtime becomes available and often right on through first month of the new year there is lots and lots of work to be had. I make quite a bit of cash, but it is taxing, and November is the start of that marathon.
This is also the month when I revisit the Estonian folk horror film, Rainer Sarnet’s November, a dazzling and hypnotic black-and-white work of art that is more vibes than plot, more atmosphere than story, and endlessly fascinating.
The days are growing shorter, the nights are growing longer, the air cools, and in this time that so many find bleak I find a renewed vitality: welcome, November.

Share

A Nightmare on Musk Street

.

Fitting for the Halloween season, Elon Musk, the world’s richest person and the man attempting to single-handedly drag a corrupt official into the United States Senate, posted on the social media site he owns the future he dreads for America.

Let’s look at the nightmare scenario point by point.
Point one: making D.C. and Puerto Rico states is an interesting fear, as it reveals two concepts. The first is that Musk is uncomfortable with citizens of the United States actually having representation in its governing bodies. He is perfectly at ease with leaving these people in a status of being true second-class citizens. The second thing this opinion reveals is he is equally confident that the Republican Party has no ability to persuade anyone of their ideas. The GOP cannot win over voters; it can only exclude the ones that do not approve of it.
His second element about open borders and limitless regularizing of statuses is wholly unsupported by any action taken by the Democratic Party at any time this century. It is a lie meant to terrorize its audience. There is absolutely no elected leader of the Democratic Party arguing for this at all. Musk is inventing a proposal that does not exist.
The final element of his doomsday scenario is that the Democratic Party, if handed both Congress and the White House, would, after killing the filibuster no doubt, pass legislation that would expand the court, a wholly legal and constitutional manner of altering its composition. Apparently, it is an unalloyed good for the conservatives to manipulate the system in order to compose a court that is amiable to their viewpoints, which strips rights from people and makes civic participation more difficult, but a terrible, nation-ending threat if the liberal Party engages in the same legal and constitutional actions. Do not be fooled. This is not about protecting some noble and just system. It is quite plainly, arguing “We get to do it, and you do not.” He wants their manipulation of the court and no one else’s
The odds are that next week Musk will not get the Halloween he desires and, all that remains to be seen is, if in frustration, he TPs America’s house.

Share

Landing That Plane

.

Carrie, Flanagan’s adaptation of the Stephen King novel, and its fumbled final episode have me once again thinking about endings, how critically important it is to get them right, and the properties that have crashed and burned because of that failure. I am going to examine some endings that did not work and explain why they failed to give me the conclusion that they required. There are undoubtedly people out there for whom some of the endings are perfect, and that is the beauty of artistic works; it is not science or mathematics with objective provable answers. It is, in the vernacular of the time, vibes.

Spoilers ahead for the following films:
An American Werewolf in London
Resident Evil (2026)
Little Shop of Horrors (1986)
Carrie (2026)

An American Werewolf in London, John Landis’ film that, along with The Howling, changed forever how audiences experienced the transformation from human to wolf in cinema, has one of the most fumbled endings in film history. The movie is noted for its heavy mix of humor and horror and its score that features a number of pop songs with the word “moon” in their lyrics or titles. Despite the frequent jokes and gags, the story ends in a very traditional manner for werewolf movies, with poor, doomed David being gunned down by London’s special forces. Even ignoring the poor blocking of the scene (just how did all those men with rifles shoot David so many times when his love, Alex, stood directly between them and their target?), the lack of any time for a denouement, a breather to let the tragedy of the tale sit in the audience’s mind, coupled with a hard edit to black and a doo-wop version of Blue Moon, emotionally scrambles the ending. What the hell am I supposed to be feeling at that moment? Triumphant because the murderous beast is dead? Sorrow at David’s fate that was no fault of his own? Mirth because that song, that version, at that time is so out of place? While there is much to admire about that movie, that ending strips away and ruins everything that came before it.

Resident Evil (2026): I have already reviewed this movie and commented that the ending did not work for me, and for much the same reason that An American Werewolf in London failed: a disconnect between the tone of the movie and its conclusion. While an audience might walk into a werewolf movie expecting a tragic end (that has been the genre’s tradition since 1941’s The Wolf Man), walking in to see a movie adapted from a video game is entirely different. One expects, or at least hopes, to win a game. Like John Landis’ take on the werewolf tale, Resident Evil is stacked with humor, much of which comes from Austin Abrams’ performance. The movie is, for all practical purposes, a one-man show centered on Abrams, and without a compelling setup to ready the audience for his failure to save himself and his transformation into one of the monsters he has spent the entire evening combating, his fall comes off as unjustified. Some might argue that is “realistic,” for whatever that word might mean in a fictional context, but stories are not about realism save the emotional variety. It would have been realistic for Luke Skywalker to continue to rely on his targeting computer and not the apparent hallucination in his ears, miss the shot, and doom the rebellion. While “realistic,” it would have been entirely contradictory to Star Wars’ tone and a terrible ending.

Little Shop of Horrors (1986): The feature film adaptation of the stage musical that was adapted from a 1960 low-budget horror of the same name has the distinction of having bungled its ending twice, in both its theatrical release and its director’s cut.

The theatrical cut, after negative responses in test screenings, forced a victorious ending with a wholly unestablished, sheer-luck method for defeating the murderous plant. The film found only middling success at the box office, which I would partly attribute to the forced feeling of the reworked conclusion.

In the stage play and the director’s original cut, both of the principal characters end up eaten by the plant, followed by an extensive sequence without any characters for the audience to identify with as the plant and its offspring conquer the world. When this was rejected by test audiences, director Frank Oz and producer David Geffen attributed the rejection to the “power of the close-up,” which they felt created a powerful bond between the protagonist and the audience. I think this reading is incorrect. In the director’s cut, a vital song, Meek Shall Inherit, is edited down, cutting out the very moment that earns the protagonist his doomed ending. In the excised section of the song, Seymour recognizes the evil of feeding people to the plant, even though he himself did not kill them, and commits himself to destroying the plant, but, fearful that a life of poverty would cost him the love of Audrey, then reverses his decision and commits himself instead to a life of evil, feeding the plant corpses. It is at this moment that he and the story earn their tragic and doomed ending. With this critical moment removed, the ending that brings about his death is no longer morally justified.

Resident Evil (2026), Little Shop of Horrors, and Carrie (2026) all fail to land their stories cleanly by ignoring the moral vector of their plots. Resident Evil employs an ending fit for a tragedy but without a character that presented a tragic flaw that earned such a sad state. Little Shop of Horrors short-circuited its tragic ending, expecting the audience’s forgiveness for the character’s misdeeds. And in Carrie, her reward of safety and compassion is wholly inappropriate for a character who willfully murdered scores of innocents and gleefully danced afterwards. An American Werewolf in London, while morally consistent with the rest of the film, rushes it ending spoiling what may have worked.

An ending, like an aircraft coming in for a landing, requires that everything be lined up and on the right glide slope at the right speed to avoid disaster.

Share

The Hour of Judgment Fast Approaches

.

As I write this on October 28th, 2026, what should be the conclusion of the midterm elections is less than a week distant. In many parts of the nation, voting has already been underway both by mail-in ballot and by early in person voting, but under the secrecy of the system, the total for those votes remains unknown.  There has been much reading of the bones, casting of the lots, and peering into the entrails to divine the outcome to come, hoping that early turnout, party participation, and other indirect data might just a glimpse of the future state. The future is unknowable, only expressed in probabilities and mathematics for most people provides cold comfort.

It is highly probably that when the voting is over the Democratic Party will have gained control of the House of Representatives to wield its powerful committees in a manner that is unlikely to be welcome at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue. It is likely, but without the highly favorable probability seen for the House, that they may also gain control of the United States Senate. However, even a random fluctuation within the margin of error of accepted polling can still result in the Republicans retaining the Senate. A moderate system polling error in either party’s favor drastically alters the makeup of the next Senate and until the votes are tallied that nature will remain unknown.

It is obvious to all that a political storm threatens the Republican Party. When nearly 200 million dollars must be spent to fight for the survival of a Republican in Texas, that is a sure sign that there are deep and powerful forces working against that party. That GOP candidates are threatened in Iowa and Kansas provides even further evidence of a mood that has swung hard against the Republican party.

I hope that the vote next week is strong, decisive, and utterly unambiguous. It is no secret that my desires are for a powerful sweep by the Democratic Party: we desperately need a check on the rampant corruption of this administration, but even more than that we need a clear and definite victory of a scale as to push it beyond any conspiratorial fantasies of ‘stolen’ elections.  For a decade poison has been infused into the electorate, the elaborations of a liar, a thief, and a man of low character who has wounded our democracy and we urgently need to heal.

Share

Carrie (2026): A Final Report

.

Last night I completed my viewing of Mike Flanagan’s adaptation of Stephen King’s debut novel Carrie for Amazon Prime. Overall, I enjoyed the season and thought that Flanagan in many respects has elevated the novel’s story and plotting, but in the end, quite literally at the season’s close, it fell flat. I doubt that I will have much interest in the second season, and the manner in which Flanagan engineered a second season is much of the reason why this adaptation fails.

Amazon Studios

First, what I liked and what worked in Flanagan’s reinterpretation of King’s debut. Carrie, the novel, is a short book even by the standard of most novels, and by the standard of King’s later works it is practically a piece of flash fiction. When it was announced that there was going to be an eight-episode series adapted from the novel, I knew that much of what would end up on the screen would be invention not found in the source text. What remained to be seen was if this expanded material would enhance the story or be more like the trilogy of movies produced from The Hobbit, wandering so far afield as to lose connection to the story’s spine. I am happy to say that the expansion enriched the story and the focus remained on Carrie White as she navigated a world that was alien to her.

In the novel, Carrie has always attended public school along with her classmates, and this actually opens up an issue that I have no memory of King addressing. Since Carrie has attended physical education with her classmates into high school, even if Carrie’s mother, Margaret White, never discussed or explained menstruation to her, I find it beggars belief to accept that Carrie never witnessed it in any form among her peers. Flanagan’s choice to have Carrie homeschooled until her father’s death neatly avoids that fault in the backstory.

Flanagan also deepened and fleshed out the character of Margaret White, a vast improvement over King’s one-note crazed Christian caricature found in the novel. I have grown quite weary of King’s stock and stereotyped fundamentalist as an easy villain. While the Whites remained a deeply religious family and Margaret seriously socially conservative, Flanagan gave the character more understandable motivations and the sense of a person with contradictions and someone who struggled to find her own way in a world to which she was, in many ways, as alien as her daughter. As the story climbs the rungs of the ladder of escalation that ends with the “Black Prom,” Margaret is not simply a doomsayer and obstacle for Carrie but a voice that is sometimes one of reason as the school and the community hurtle towards disaster.

Continuing on the notes concerning characters and where Flanagan improved on the source text brings us to the story’s principal antagonist, Christine (Chris) Hargensen. It has been a number of decades since I read Carrie, so my memory may be a little faulty and colored more by the De Palma film than by the actual text, but, as I recall, King gave very little exploration of Chris’ character. Where the novel briefly touched on her father as lawyer who failed to save her from her exclusion from the prom, Flanagan crafts a more detailed home life and history of a father who is emotionally distant and a bully, behavior that Chris mirrors. I recall scenes where she and her boyfriend, Billy Nolan, plotted and carried out the hideous attack on Carrie but very little that explained, in any manner at all, why Chris was the way she was.

There is a fairly strong current over the last few decades, in film at least, of not only making the villains of a piece understandable but also a little bit right. Magneto’s experience as a European Jew who barely survived the Holocaust gives weight and authority to his argument that humanity and its racialized hatreds is the real villain of history. It is true that every villain is the hero of their own story, but that does not mean that every villain needs to have any sense of pursuing a worthy goal. With Chris Hargensen, Flanagan gives us enough of her life that we can understand without excusing her cruel and spiteful nature. She is a spoiled rich girl whose universe has always bent in her favor Now, as that world fractures and shatters and her entitlement goes unfulfilled. Instead of looking into herself and growing as a person, she lashes out, making others, particularly Carrie White, the recipients of her misplaced anger and frustration.

Another improvement is one I mentioned in passing earlier in this essay: the ladder of escalation. The novel opens with Carrie’s first menstruation and the cruel jeering she receives from her classmates, which leads almost immediately to Chris’ punishment and expulsion from the prom, which provokes the pig blood bath she and Billy carry out on poor Carrie. The reader is left to understand that there is a long history of Carrie being bullied and to accept this as justification for the rapidity with which the situation grew. Flanagan, having established that Carrie had never attended public school, crafted a series of incidents, each building upon the previous, that pushed the character of Chris further and further in her need to lash out and hurt someone for the shambles that her life had become.

Taking the story out of its mid-’70s setting and placing it into a contemporary environment with social media and school shootings and the vast web of conspiracy-addled subcultures proved one of the most challenging aspects of adapting the novel and one that Flanagan met quite handily. More than simply bringing cell phones and their cameras to the Black Prom, Flanagan integrated our current social issues and media into the story itself, making them essential rungs on that ladder of escalation that climbs to disaster.

With all these promising and praiseworthy elements, it makes the parts of the series that don’t work even more disappointing.

I found all of the teenage boys to be woefully underwritten.

Tommy Ross, Sue’s boyfriend, whom she convinces to take Carrie to the prom in her place, left no lasting impression in the novel, feeling more like a plot contrivance than a character, but he has even less to do in Flanagan’s adaptation. He spends six episodes either playing the devoted boyfriend or the sulking teenager when Sue, wrapped up in her own crisis, ignores him. It is only in episode seven that he takes any action of his own before briefly being cut down at the disastrous prom.

Billy Nolan, even more than Tommy Ross, is a device whose only function is to move the plot forward. My memory of Billy in the novel is of a sociopath who got sexual excitement from using his car to run down and kill dogs. In Flanagan’s version, he is a low-level drug dealer and not much more than that.

Moving beyond the thinly written teenage boys, I found it difficult to fully accept Flanagan’s opening up the world of Carrie to a constellation of enhanced and psychically empowered women beyond Carrie White. While King hinted at this when he closed the novel with a mother’s letter reporting that she watched her little girl move marbles without touching them, Flanagan introduces disciplined organizations of psychics, detecting each other psychic over vast distances, moving to recruit them. The series also introduces organizations that, seeing the psychics as an existential danger, hunt and murder them. Tonally, this moves the entire series from horror to nearly a superhero story. All this I might have been able to set aside had Flanagan not, with his radically altered ending, changed the very nature of Carrie.

Spoilers for the season finale follow.

Carrie at its core is a tragedy. The characters are trapped by their nature on a course that can only lead to their own destruction. The novel ends with Carrie White, racked with guilt at the death and destruction she has caused, bleeding out and dying. While some characters survived the hellish prom, there is no happy ending for anyone, and the end result of so much hatred and pettiness is fire and death.

Flanagan instead has Carrie White survive her night of retribution, saved by the psychic friends who have come to foil the hunter bent on Carrie’s murder and who spirit the young girl away for some undefined future.

This ending transforms a tragic conclusion into one that is disturbingly close to a victorious one. Let us be plainly clear here: in this story Carrie White murdered hundreds of people, the vast majority of whom not only had performed no act of cruelty towards her but in this very version had been in her corner, celebrating and honoring Carrie White. King was right in having her die at the end of the story: there is no redemption for her mass murder. Flanagan, setting up a season two, has in effect given a victory to what is for all practical purposes a school shooter. The ending as he crafted it is not one where a person who possesses both the ability and the temperament to murder on an unimaginable scale has frighteningly escaped but rather one where this person is given safety and support and is assured that she did nothing wrong. This ending inverts entirely the thematic nature of King’s novel. Perhaps Amazon/MGM pushed for something like this so they could have a franchise to profit from; perhaps Flanagan himself pitched this new take. Frankly, it doesn’t matter. The ending makes its case clear: it justifies murdering those who torment you, and collateral damage is of no consequence. That is a conclusion that drives me away from having any interest in the already announced second season.

Share

Movie Review: Klara and the Sun

After I recovered from a brief illness from some bug I caught at jury duty that kept me home on Friday, my sweetie-wife and I attended a screening of Klara and the Sun on Sunday morning.

Sony/Columbia Pictures

Adapted from a novel by prize-winning author Kazuo Ishiguro, who penned the novel that was the source material for one of my favorite films, The Remains of the Day, and adapted to the screen by Kiwi filmmaker Taika Waititi and co-scripter Dahvi Waller, Klara and the Sun is the story of an artificial friend, Klara (Jenna Ortega), a humanoid robot that is purchased as a companion for an ill teenager, Josie (Mia Tharia). Klara, who has never experienced anything beyond the confines of the retail store, has a childlike understanding of the larger world and believes the sun to be a magical being with healing powers. Josie’s home is a broken one, her father having left after the death of Josie’s older sister, and her mother (Amy Adams) still harboring secrets and unresolved grief that are exacerbated by Josie’s serious illness, an illness that is an adverse event from Josie being “lifted,” that is, genetically manipulated into superior academic ability. Klara attempts to navigate a world that she doesn’t understand, Josie’s illness, the housekeeper’s suspicions, and the secret plot hiding at the heart of the shattered family while growing beyond the confines of her programming.

Waititi is a filmmaker known for an energetic and somewhat chaotic style of cinema. His first entry in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Thor: Ragnarok, shook that franchise free from the staid and neo-Shakespearean style in favor of something more akin to the wild and psychedelic art of Jack Kirby. His adaptation of Caging Skies into the dramatic comedy Jojo Rabbit, where Waititi himself played the young protagonist’s imaginary friend, Adolf Hitler, won both critical and popular praise but again leaned heavily into wild absurdist humor that served as a contrast to the darker story of a young boy enraptured by Nazi ideology and his process of breaking free from it. Klara and the Sun required a lighter touch than Waititi typically employs, and he managed it.

I have read only one novel by Ishiguro, The Remains of the Day, and while the writing is absolutely brilliant, I have no memory of the text being particularly funny. It is a tragic tale of a man so bound by his sense of duty that he puts everything else aside, including family and his own chance at real happiness, to perform services that are mostly taken for granted. I suspect that the novel Klara and the Sun is equally humor-free, and expecting Waititi to craft a feature film free of humor would be asking too much. Waititi managed to find a balance between his own wild sense of humor and the needs of this particular project.

Cinematographer Mike Berlucchi captures Klara’s wondrous rapture with the sun quite well, giving us magical moments at sunrises and sunsets, even finding those fleeting moments in the middle of an urban landscape when the sun can still bring life to the tired.

Klara and the Sun is a charming and sentimental film that never stumbles into being maudlin, one that reminds us that there is magic in life if only we would look for it with the right eyes.

Share